• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

Is it in bad taste to point out the symbolism and themes in your own work?

Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
That's nae joke by the by...
iHRPGY7.jpg

If you don't get it...
 
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
I don't know if this is relevant, but an art history undergraduate once shared with me a quote from a famous artist/critic/somebody (sorry for the vagueness) to the effect that:

"any work of art, once released to the world, no longer belongs to the creator," (sic).

In this I understood him/her to mean that whatever intentions, themes and symbols you may have intended when you were creating, may or may not be recognisable to the recipient. Indeed other symbols and ideas may come to the reader or viewer that have nothing to do with the author/artist.

The intentions, both implicit and explicit, in our writing will always be there, but should we try to lead the reader to see them?
 
Last edited:
I don't know if this is relevant, but an art history undergraduate once shared a quote from a famous artist/critic/somebody (sorry for the vagueness) to the effect that:

"any work of art, once released to the world, no longer belongs to the creator," (sic).

In this I understood him/her to mean that whatever intentions, themes and symbols you may have intended when you were creating, they are may or may not be recognisable to the recipient. Indeed other symbols and ideas may come to the reader or viewer that have nothing to do with the author/artist.

The intentions, both implicit and explicit, in our writing will always be there, but should we try to lead the reader to see them?
Good point. 'Truth is a shattered mirror strewn, while each believes his little bit the whole to own'. Same with art I suppose.
 
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Further Articles from the Author Platform

Latest Articles By Litopians

  • There’s More to Love Than Boy Meets Girl
    Prompted by a comment from a fellow Litopian, I delved into the far reaches of my record stacks to r ...
  • Stakes
    What are Stakes? Stakes refer to what characters stand to lose or gain as they pursue their goals. T ...
  • Until I find You
    As one wise Litopian recently said to me, ‘Titles SUCK!!’ When I wrote songs, I never had a prob ...
  • She Loved Me Not
    . Last night I dreamed of Samantha Who tore at my throat like a panther Then she started to chew My ...
  • Both Sides of the Postcard
    The sand is white and soft. The palms sway gently. The turquoise water glitters. The happy traveler ...
  • What’s in a game?
    6When my son was a toddler, he threw the mother of all tantrums at my childless friends’ house. I ...
  • The Shadow Durian
    As a lifelong foreigner, I’ve learnt that being open to new things smooths the path considerably. ...
Back
Top