At the risk of being accused of being sexist or reverse-ageist, I mention the appearances, ages and literary careers of the winners of the two most lucrative writing prizes in 2017. The Daily Mail/Penguin Random House First Crime Novel Competition and the Amazon Kindle Storyteller Award both offered £20,000 and guaranteed publication as prizes.
I entered the DM competition, rather than Amazon's, largely owing to their insistence on exclusivity, meaning that I'd have to remove my ebooks from other online sales venues—a laborious and haphazard process that can take months. I don't like being bossed about, and also, I was troubled by Amazon's opaque references to the commercial viability of any entrants, which was partly decided by readers' purchases. Sure enough, the winner a historical novelist called
David Leadbeater has already sold 750,000 ebooks—so he's a safe commercial bet (it ain't much of a competition when the winner is already the winner!). His appearance and age are unimportant compared to his track record at making money.
On the other hand, the winner of the DM competition is easy on the eye and has youth too, with a marketable family background.
Lizzy Barber's winning novel may be fantastic, for all I know, but the Daily Mail is a notoriously sexist and ageist newspaper given to disparaging people's appearance, so I'm not surprised that the winner meets their criteria. It would have been a real turn up for the book had they chosen a morbidly obese, or even haggard, frightening-looking pensioner!
I can't help wondering how much writing competition organisers research the backgrounds and looks of entrants they're considering as winners.
I'm starting to sound jaundiced, I know and I've made some provocative observations, but what do you think?