Read those years ago and really enjoyed them. (They get a lot of poor reviews, but the guy was only 16 when he wrote Eragon.) He's presently writing or has written a fifth in the series.I'm reading Paolini's Inheritance Cycle now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.
This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.
Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…
We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.
You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box
Read those years ago and really enjoyed them. (They get a lot of poor reviews, but the guy was only 16 when he wrote Eragon.) He's presently writing or has written a fifth in the series.I'm reading Paolini's Inheritance Cycle now.
Really enjoyed 7 deaths. Also enjoyed his next book The Devil and the Dark Water. Didn't quite live up to 7 deaths, but a story like his debut will be hard to beat.The 7 deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle was recommended to me but the blurb made me pass it by, until now. Damn, Stuart Turton, you actually pulled off something new. A debut novel from a travel writer. Wow. For me it captures the feeling of being caught in a bad dream trying to find your way out. The prose is elegant and spare, the story deft and clever. A new kind of murder mystery. "Gosford Park meets Inception" really doesnt do it justice.
I'm enjoying The Death House by Sarah Pinborough, though I didn't really expect to. I was researching her because of her agent, and SP's better known for psychological thrillers, which this isn't. Excellent characterisation and well written, if a tiny bit slow.
The author might have originally meant it as Y/A, given its cast of young people, but it wasn't marketed as that. A tragic love story in a speculative setting, the plot has strong similarities to Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go, though here we know from the outset what the situation of the young people is. The 'feel' is different, too, and I was trying to recall what it reminded me of – it's The Lord of the Flies.
Perhaps more when I get to the end.
I think you would like it. Now finished it, and I found it very good.Ooh, that interests me. You got me at LotFs![]()
Re Y/A – I am completely amazed.
When I checked Wikipedia just now, it said that The Death House (2016) was a HORROR novel. It was even shortlisted in its publication year for a horror prize.
That puts a whole new slant on things. As Y/A/Crossover, it's charming, romantic, elegiac even. As horror, it's probably a bit underpowered. And the sweet, lovely ending doesn't work for that genre at all.
I thought Pinborough did some clever things with scenes where the reader could feel the baddie was any moment going to be really bad – but he did a bit of a last-minute swerve and failed to be 100% evil. How does that fit in with horror?
Can someone else please read this and let us have their view?
I can't leave it go either.I'm on the case, lol
I want to read more of her work, especially since she builds worlds in which magic is magic and not a quantifiable D&D factor.I just finished "The Fifth Season" by N. K. Jemisin. (Science Fiction. Awarded the Hugo Award for Best Novel in 2016. Series was as well.)
The book came highly recommended to me. I picked it up a while ago (years?) and put it on my "to read" pile as you do. I started it a few times, and it just never grabbed me, so I put it back on the "to read" pile, not the "abandoned" pile, as it was so highly recommended. I finally picked it up again with the intention to finish it. I just finished it this morning.
Holy crap.
Sure it took me a wee bit to get into it, but am I ever glad I pushed on. This book is absolutely brilliant. But not in the usual way. I never really warmed to the MC. She was always held a bit at arm's length, which felt appropriate for who she was. I shed no tears (I'm a super soft touch) and even at the end of the book, I was dry-eyed.
But as as I reluctantly, and at the same time, with a sigh of relief, closed the book, my eyes were like saucers, wide and unblinking, while my mind reeled in the sheer scope and magnificence of the story and it's telling.
The world-building is staggering. At the start of the book, it confused me, but the deeper you go, the deeper it gets. And the society is as unique as I've read. A lot is similar, so that you're not adrift, but there's elements that feel so alien, and yet, so reminiscent of our own more shameful history. The characters feel real, not heroes, or superheroes, or extraordinary, although some are, but all felt like people just trying to live, to find their place, to survive their tragedies. But the telling... the telling... I am still in awe of how N. K. Jemisin pulled off the incredible way she told this story. It's something I will think about for a long, long time.
If you're looking for a sweet, light-hearted tale, this is not that. But if you want to be blown away, this can't help but do that.
PS I have to add this in as I found it so refreshing to read... this was in the acknowledgments (no spoilers, but possibly typos as I'm just typing it here from the book.)
"Also big props to my editor, Devi Pillai, and my agent, Lucienne Driver, for talking me out of scrapping this novel. The Broken Earth trilogy is the most challenging work I've ever written, and at certain points during The Fifth Season, the task seemed so overwhelming that I thought about quitting. (Actually, I believe my exact words were, "Delete this hot mess, hack the Dropbox to get the backups there, drop my laptop off a cliff, drive over it with a car, set fire to both, then use a backhoe to bury the evidence. Do you need a special license to drive a backhoe?") Kate Elliott (another acknowledgement, for being a perpetual mentor and friend) calls moments like this the "Chasm of Doubt" that ever writer hits at some point during a major project. Mine was deep and awful....
then comes a few more acknowledgements of who else helped talk her off a cliff, including her cat, "yeah, even the damned cat" to conclude with.... "It takes a village to keep a writer from losing her shit, okay?"
I just finished "The Fifth Season" by N. K. Jemisin. (Science Fiction. Awarded the Hugo Award for Best Novel in 2016. Series was as well.)
The book came highly recommended to me. I picked it up a while ago (years?) and put it on my "to read" pile as you do. I started it a few times, and it just never grabbed me, so I put it back on the "to read" pile, not the "abandoned" pile, as it was so highly recommended. I finally picked it up again with the intention to finish it. I just finished it this morning.
Holy crap.
Sure it took me a wee bit to get into it, but am I ever glad I pushed on. This book is absolutely brilliant. But not in the usual way. I never really warmed to the MC. She was always held a bit at arm's length, which felt appropriate for who she was. I shed no tears (I'm a super soft touch) and even at the end of the book, I was dry-eyed.
But as as I reluctantly, and at the same time, with a sigh of relief, closed the book, my eyes were like saucers, wide and unblinking, while my mind reeled in the sheer scope and magnificence of the story and it's telling.
The world-building is staggering. At the start of the book, it confused me, but the deeper you go, the deeper it gets. And the society is as unique as I've read. A lot is similar, so that you're not adrift, but there's elements that feel so alien, and yet, so reminiscent of our own more shameful history. The characters feel real, not heroes, or superheroes, or extraordinary, although some are, but all felt like people just trying to live, to find their place, to survive their tragedies. But the telling... the telling... I am still in awe of how N. K. Jemisin pulled off the incredible way she told this story. It's something I will think about for a long, long time.
If you're looking for a sweet, light-hearted tale, this is not that. But if you want to be blown away, this can't help but do that.
PS I have to add this in as I found it so refreshing to read... this was in the acknowledgments (no spoilers, but possibly typos as I'm just typing it here from the book.)
"Also big props to my editor, Devi Pillai, and my agent, Lucienne Driver, for talking me out of scrapping this novel. The Broken Earth trilogy is the most challenging work I've ever written, and at certain points during The Fifth Season, the task seemed so overwhelming that I thought about quitting. (Actually, I believe my exact words were, "Delete this hot mess, hack the Dropbox to get the backups there, drop my laptop off a cliff, drive over it with a car, set fire to both, then use a backhoe to bury the evidence. Do you need a special license to drive a backhoe?") Kate Elliott (another acknowledgement, for being a perpetual mentor and friend) calls moments like this the "Chasm of Doubt" that ever writer hits at some point during a major project. Mine was deep and awful....
then comes a few more acknowledgements of who else helped talk her off a cliff, including her cat, "yeah, even the damned cat" to conclude with.... "It takes a village to keep a writer from losing her shit, okay?"
I joined a craft book bookclub, and our first book to read is "Story Genius" by Lisa Cron. The subtitle is "How to use Brain Science to go beyond outlining and write a riveting novel*" and then the *is also on the front cover and it says [*Before you waste three years writing 327 pages that go nowhere.]
Yuck. That's what I thought just from that title. But I wanted to read it for the book club I just joined. I continued to think yuck until about 30% in. The style of the book is "Myth busting - you thought this. Well, Nope! That's wrong." And the "Science" is pseudo science and pretty basic stuff. There really wasn't anything in the first 30% that I hadn't heard before. And there's a LOT of filler. Like she really knows how to make a meal of a snack. I was pretty annoyed.
Then she hit on something that I thought, ooooh, that's kind of good. And it got me thinking, and then it got me doing the exercises for my current story. It was stuff I'd kind of already worked out, but this solidified and deepened what I had. Like a lot. There's also an example of a real writer working through this exercise for this book. Cron was pretty fortunate to have this writer agree to do that. It was something I hadn't seen before, and was really interesting. The story being writen was of no interest to me, but the process was.
I'm 72% in now, and back to skimming. She calls an outline a "blueprint" and talks about the "Story Genius Index Cards" method like it's a revelation. And the stuff she writes about "endings" I actually just don't agree with a lot of it. And she even goes as far as telling you what to name and how to organize your files for your novel. Um. really?
Now, if this had been my first craft book, I might not be so cynical. But it's not, so I am. That said, even if the last 28% doesn't yield insights for me, I am still glad I've read it for that one section that got me excited and gave me something I'll use moving forward. That's huge. You gotta take the golden nuggets where you can!
Ah cool! I hear it's a very "love it" or "hate it" kinda book. So glad to hear that you got so much out of it. xI enjoyed Story Genius. I was the same with the story. Not interested in the story, but the process of writing it was fascinating. For me, the table on page 153 has been priceless. I'm always coming back to it![]()
What does it say about Litopia? Making better writers of us all.I haven't been able to finish any published books lately - unusual for me but they're just not holding my attention - but I've beta-read for a couple of Litopians in the past few weeks and was hooked, finishing their novels quickly. What does this say about the publishing industry?
I won't be reading it, but I know the guy. Great to see him doing so well.One for the crime readers, and in no way is it cosy. (This is slightly amended from my Amazon review.)
Gritty, bloodthirsty and very, very Scots: Squeaky Clean by Callum McSorley
(debut novel, winner of this year's McIlwanney Scottish crime prize)
First, let me say when I call this 'very, very Scots', I am Scots. (Born, bred, educated... etc) And for the purists, South-Central Scots, with some time spent in both Aberdeen and Dundee. So I don't have any problems with the dialect, the idioms and the geography that the author uses.
I say it merely to point out that McSorley isn't taking any prisoners in any of those respects, and some readers may struggle. His writing is tight, with no room for (any) explanations that might slow the flow. He sets the bar high for himself in terms of dialect, with most of the narrative in shades of Glesca plus sections in what one of the Glaswegian hoods describes as 'either Dundee or Aberdeen'. (I'm not sure, but McSorley may have meant him to have got that wrong.) The third person narrator is also Glaswegian.
After a slowish start – how exciting is a car wash? – the story barrels along. The characters are strong, varying from gormless to seriously unlikable to downright terrifying, and the omni-present violence is gruesome and real. Ultra-violence. I feel sure most men will wince at least once.
The plot is dense. At over 70% on my Kindle I still had no idea at all how it was going to unwind. Absolutely everyone except a couple of potential fall guys (one the female cop) seems to have an agenda; no one is entirely what they appear and the greasy tentacles of 'organised' crime work their way in everywhere, unseen but apparently inescapable.
One quibble: the Scottish sporting in-jokes. Too, too many.
He was quite unkind about teuchters in the book, but I thought I wouldn't mention that! I knew at least one person here would get it.I won't be reading it, but I know the guy. Great to see him doing so well.
@Jonny - I agree. But to be fair, nothing ever holds a candle to Hitchhiker's Guide. Never has. Never will. It's in a league of it's own.Over the past month I have just revisited the entire Hitchhiker's Guide series. Never grow tired of it. Sublime.
Last time I did this was probably ten years ago and since then, joining Litopia in the interim, I have been pointed in the direction of Terry Pratchett's stuff.
Now I know this won't be a popular opinion, but I have to say I think Adams has it in spades over Sir TP. For me Pratchett's work is far too meandering and unfocused. Whacky for whackiness sake. None of his characters can seem to walk from A to B without a multitude of diversions as a device to crowbar in some kind of, at best, an occasionally moderately amusing joke.