What are you reading at the moment? Recommendations welcome

KateESal

What's the point of a traditional publishing deal, anyway?

  • KateESal
  • Replies: 36
From Our Blog

Blog Post: I Miss Your Smile

  • From Our Blog
  • Replies: 8
Julie said:
It's not that I'm stuck for reading anything at the moment, but it's nice to know what Litopians are reading - might provide valuable material for a writer or a pleasant diversion away from the genre s/he are writing in. I was going to say 'Bookshelf,' but that's recently been mentioned as a possible scam. But it would be quite nice to peruse our own 'Litopian Library' as an accompaniment to local bookshops/Amazon, etc.
Someone in the Welcome Lounge mentioned writing about walking the entire UK coast with his dog, and I asked whether he'd read The Salt Path and Five Hundred Mile Walkies.
No need to write a review, just author, title and genre (if not apparent).

I've just finished Harrow Lake by Kat Ellis a YA Horror. I'm now reading Colin Wilson's Ritual in the Dark (the terrifying thriller of murder most macabre) and for the past few months I've been dipping into Folk Horror Revival: Field Studies, Essays and Interview -Various Authors. The latter has been brilliant for ideas with my WiP and it led to me reading Colin Wilson who I'm enjoying and may never have otherwise discovered.
Anyway, just floating it out there. :)
Click to expand...
Hello! I've just discovered Peter Clines and read Paradox Bound. Love his voice and the smooth storytelling with great characters. Right up my soft SF thriller street.
 
Adrian McKinty's latest Detective Sean Duffy novel. The Detective up Late (#7 in the series with two more due for publication in the not too distant).

I've enjoyed every one immensely, and to me they are so much better than his two real global biggies - The Chain & The Island.
 
Read Naomi Novik's The Last Graduate - second in her Scholomance trilogy. Mainly because I'd bought books one and two together so it was on my tbr pile. Also because I've loved Novik's previous works and held out hope that this would be better than book One, A Deafly Education.
What was wrong with book one? An enormous amount of expositional worldbuilding, in such huge chunks that I could have torn those pages out and made an actual brick out of them. An enormous amount of internal monologue from the MC, who had a good voice if she didn't keep going on and on and on . . . ,
So book two wouldn't need the world building, and MC must be all out of monologue so we can get on with story, right? Wrong. Having told us most of the workings of the Scholomance (a school for wizard kids that's plagued by wizard-kid-eating monsters) in book one, let's just throw in a whole load of info about politics outside the school as a set up for book 3, most of which is totally unnecessary in book 2. Internal monologue? Oh dear. Novik has her MC addicted to making us suffer from her continuous droning.
I ploughed through in the vain hope that Novik would come to her senses and give us the wonderful story I know she's capable of. The last 3 chapters speeded up. At last some excitement leading to a . . . unsatisfactory ending. Because, of course, she wants you to read book 3.
No. Much as the MC has a good voice (if only she'd use it more sparingly), I can't face ploughing through another. I just needed to know if a certain character survived, so I read up on the plot which answered me and told me that a really main and followable character in books one and two is given almost no page space in book 3, and the MCs character arc basically flattens, and she does stuff that is just not on (no spoilers in case you want to read it rather than thrashing yourself in the back for your sins). So, I won't be buying book 3, and I'll be giving books one and two away to the next charity bag or tombola that takes them.
 
Hannah F said:
Read Naomi Novik's The Last Graduate - second in her Scholomance trilogy. Mainly because I'd bought books one and two together so it was on my tbr pile. Also because I've loved Novik's previous works and held out hope that this would be better than book One, A Deafly Education.
What was wrong with book one? An enormous amount of expositional worldbuilding, in such huge chunks that I could have torn those pages out and made an actual brick out of them. An enormous amount of internal monologue from the MC, who had a good voice if she didn't keep going on and on and on . . . ,
So book two wouldn't need the world building, and MC must be all out of monologue so we can get on with story, right? Wrong. Having told us most of the workings of the Scholomance (a school for wizard kids that's plagued by wizard-kid-eating monsters) in book one, let's just throw in a whole load of info about politics outside the school as a set up for book 3, most of which is totally unnecessary in book 2. Internal monologue? Oh dear. Novik has her MC addicted to making us suffer from her continuous droning.
I ploughed through in the vain hope that Novik would come to her senses and give us the wonderful story I know she's capable of. The last 3 chapters speeded up. At last some excitement leading to a . . . unsatisfactory ending. Because, of course, she wants you to read book 3.
No. Much as the MC has a good voice (if only she'd use it more sparingly), I can't face ploughing through another. I just needed to know if a certain character survived, so I read up on the plot which answered me and told me that a really main and followable character in books one and two is given almost no page space in book 3, and the MCs character arc basically flattens, and she does stuff that is just not on (no spoilers in case you want to read it rather than thrashing yourself in the back for your sins). So, I won't be buying book 3, and I'll be giving books one and two away to the next charity bag or tombola that takes them.
Click to expand...
I'm delighted to read this, Hannah, as I was thinking of reading these, so now I'll give them a wide berth :) (everything you mention makes me Itchy with annoyance!)
 
I'm about to start The Dark Tower, the final volume of Stephen King's saga. I've also been re-reading some of the Charlie Parker books, which are superb thrillers with a very significant dash of horror (like when a recipe says use 2 cloves of garlic and you use 12).

I'm planning to re-read This Thing of Darkness by Harry Thompson as well, which is possibly my all time favourite book.
 
Just finished One of Us is Lying. YA crime by Karen McManus. It was an enjoyable read especially as I didn't manage to guess the whodunnit. With the four POVs, I'd have liked a greater difference in their voices. Sometimes I had to recheck the chapter title to see who was talking. It didn't have enough impact on me to make me want to read her next one, but crime is not my go to. It was useful as an example of a bestselling contemporary YA.
 

Attachments

  • 20231028_103437[5525].jpg
    20231028_103437[5525].jpg
    729.5 KB · Views: 0
Just finished Knots and Crosses. Ian Rankin's 1st John Rebus novel. Once again, the so-called "craft rules" ridden over roughshod by a coach and horses. Did nothing to mar my experience. Like a lot of these extended series, as a debut it was good though not stunning by a long chalk. But, the pace was breakneck throughout and kept me completely engaged.

I'm now halfway through Quite Ugly One Morning. The 1st of Chris Brookmyre's Jack Parlabane series. Brookmyre for me is nothing short of brilliant. Darkly hilarious, politically contentious and a superb storyteller. Re so-called no-nos and bad craft. He thinks nothing of frequently throwing in 4-5 pages of telling and backstory but never once loses me.

This book has one of the most brilliant darkly hilarious first chapters ever. Icing on the cake here is David Tennant's narration. A total joy. You can sense his ear-to-ear grinning on almost every sentence.
 
/wry humour on

I'm reading West Sussex Superstitions by Charlotte Latham, published in 1878. It opens with a quote written in 1776, and it strikes me as so indicative of the times, so pompously offensive, that I had to share it here:

It is the hardest thing in the world to shake off superstitious prejudices: they are sucked in, as it were, with our mother's milk; and, growing up with us at a time when they take the fastest hold and make the most lasting impressions, become so interwoven into our very constitutions, that the strongest good sense is required to disengage ourselves from them. No wonder, therefore, that the lower people retain them their whole lives through, since their minds are not invigorated by a liberal education, and therefore not enabled to make any efforts adequate to the occasion. Such a preamble appears to be necessary before we enter on the superstitions of this district, lest we should be suspected of exaggeration in a recital of practices too gross for this enlightened age.​

In our shiny post-post-modern times, could you simply replace "superstitious prejudices" with "nutjob conspiracy theories" and leave the rest untouched? Or would you be labelled unkind and skinned alive on Xwitter? You'd have to do something about "lower people". That is offensive whichever way you cut it. But the rest... hmm.

/wry humour off
 
I know, right! And of course the implication is that people at the time would read this and nod sagely – Oh, those foolish lower people, what is one to do! The British class system (caste system) was so damn rigid.
 
It looks like Charlotte Latham wasn't only in the business of attacking those she deemed "lower". On page 11, she has a go at one of her own:

[PROGNOSTICS OF GOOD AND EVIL.] (34) Beware, too, of singing before breakfast : if you sing before breakfast, you will cry before night. I have found this superstition prevalent amongst both gentle and simple; and I know a very highly educated lady who seems to place implicit faith in it.​

I'll stop now, but there's some great (and hilarious) material in here for anyone writing historical in this period.
 
Just finished A Man With One Of Those Faces by Caimh (pronounced Qweeve) McDonnell. A really fun crime read. Full of great characters, Irish humour and wit. It's book one of The Dublin Trilogy (7 books so far, I believe :) )

The narrator Morgan C Jones makes it come alive. Pleased I have found a new author with quite a prolific body of work to enjoy.
 
Jonny said:
Just finished A Man With One Of Those Faces by Caimh (pronounced Qweeve) McDonnell. A really fun crime read. Full of great characters, Irish humour and wit. It's book one of The Dublin Trilogy (7 books so far, I believe :) )

The narrator Morgan C Jones makes it come alive. Pleased I have found a new author with quite a prolific body of work to enjoy.
Click to expand...
I find his Dublin Trilogy quite like Chris Brookmyre, though not so dark. If you don't know him, you might like him, too. (And he's written a lot.) If you can manage McDonnell's Dublin, you can probably get through Brookmyre's Paisley without a translator. (But if you do need one...)
 
Just finished The Foundling by Stacey Halls. Dual POV. The first part was in one POV, then it switched to another POV. This second part was good, but I felt I was missing experiencing the 1st POVs inner conflict at this stage in the story. I could imagine it, but I'd like to have experienced it. I was pleased it switched again. Then switched again and this fourth part was very engaging but again missing the 1st POVs inner conflict. I think it would have been better to switch more often so we get the whole story from both POVs. Just my opinion of course.
 
E G Logan said:
Now that would be a challenge for the average audio book narrator. I'd recommend buying the books, on paper.
Click to expand...
I love Brookmyre, he's one of my favourite authors and in the past two years I have consumed almost everything of his (in audiobook too) Easy for me as I'm from Northern Ireland. I speak fluent Weegie :) So many similarities to Belfast slang and dialect.

Brookmyre's dark humour is razor sharp, merciless and rips his targets to shreds.

Agree, Dublin Trilogy a great comp.
 
I found 'A Tale Etched in Blood and Thick Black Pencil' – the one that goes right back to primary school – a challenge in places, and my whole family is from Paisley. I was born there.

Partly Brookmyre had set the bar very high for himself, using period-correct slang in the children's dialogue. (Yes, really.) That is, what young schoolchildren in Paisley were saying then, not what anybody has said in recent years. I had to shake my head hard a couple of times to think back.

And I struggled with the spelling; I think someone somewhere in the publication process, maybe even B himself, had tried to 'normalise' the spelling. Didn't work for me. I had to sound some of it out loud to get it.

But worth it in the end.

Who narrates Brookmyre's audiobooks? Assuming they couldn't get Gerard Butler (too Hollywood), or maybe Paolo Nutini (not his thing)... maybe Peter Capaldi? He was very good in 'The Crow Road', much of it set the Paisley side of Glasgow. That's another one worth reading, but I'd assume you already have.
 
There are a variety of narrators but for me the best two are Angus King & Sarah Barron. Interesting you mention A Tale Etched in Blood and Thick Black Pencil. I had no bother with that, but then again - I'm of that vintage. :rolling-on-the-floor-laughing:
 
E G Logan said:
I found 'A Tale Etched in Blood and Thick Black Pencil' – the one that goes right back to primary school – a challenge in places, and my whole family is from Paisley. I was born there.

Partly Brookmyre had set the bar very high for himself, using period-correct slang in the children's dialogue. (Yes, really.) That is, what young schoolchildren in Paisley were saying then, not what anybody has said in recent years. I had to shake my head hard a couple of times to think back.

And I struggled with the spelling; I think someone somewhere in the publication process, maybe even B himself, had tried to 'normalise' the spelling. Didn't work for me. I had to sound some of it out loud to get it.

But worth it in the end.

Who narrates Brookmyre's audiobooks? Assuming they couldn't get Gerard Butler (too Hollywood), or maybe Paolo Nutini (not his thing)... maybe Peter Capaldi? He was very good in 'The Crow Road', much of it set the Paisley side of Glasgow. That's another one worth reading, but I'd assume you already have.
Click to expand...
Ye cannae throw a jam piece oot a twenty storey flat,
A hundred Glasgeh hungry weans will testify tae that,
If butter, cheese or jeely, if the breid is plain or pan,
The odds against the right side up are ninety-nine tae wan.
 
Jonny said:
There are a variety of narrators but for me the best two are Angus King & Sarah Barron. Interesting you mention A Tale Etched in Blood and Thick Black Pencil. I had no bother with that, but then again - I'm of that vintage. :rolling-on-the-floor-laughing:
Click to expand...
Me, too – and the rest. Hence the stretching to remember.
 
Just finished a very popular YA, Fourth Wing, and I'm rethinking. I don't think YA is for me anymore. It was so melodramatic! A good concept but I kept thinking, 'get to the story,' and I struggled to care. I liked the banter though. It earned a few laughs.
 
RK Wallis said:
Just finished a very popular YA, Fourth Wing, and I'm rethinking. I don't think YA is for me anymore. It was so melodramatic! A good concept but I kept thinking, 'get to the story,' and I struggled to care. I liked the banter though. It earned a few laughs.
Click to expand...
Fourth Wing is really New adult. I haven't read it, but it's getting a marmite response.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
KateESal

What's the point of a traditional publishing deal, anyway?

  • KateESal
  • Replies: 36
From Our Blog

Blog Post: I Miss Your Smile

  • From Our Blog
  • Replies: 8
Back
Top