Hannah F
Full Member
And the "hug" is very important at times, I think, and often better than saying any words.Re @Hannah F's post on her profile (about missing the 'like' button in the new Lab. - My response it too long for the box there, so I'm posting here.)
I agree.
While I get why the 'like, love, haha, etc' buttons have been removed there, I do wonder whether they were more useful than not. I don't think they were damaging in any way. Actually now they're gone, I realise they were super useful both when giving and receiving feedback.
1) They were a good way of giving someone a quick nod (esp after a rewrite) to tell them that they're on the right track now.
2) They showed an instant gut reaction. "Yes!"
3) They told me that someone has read my post and has given it a thought, and that they have nothing to add further. It made me feel 'heard', less 'lonely', and that I'm not talking-to-the-wall-hellooo-is-anyone-out-there-actually-reading-this. (Esp in the Writing Accountability Thread where we simply post what we've been up to. It's nice there to have an acknowledgement that someone is there 'with us'.)
4) The distinction between "like", "love" and "haha" was also useful because again, it shows a gut reaction.
Maybe it's too soon to say bring them back @AgentPete? But I don't think Litopians are of the social-media-"like"-hunter type. It's nice to have the option to just click 'like' without having to write it in a box (and no, I'm not lazy. Ok I am. ) , esp when I'm super busy and am doing things between things, and also when I visit the site using the phone.... But mainly because of my points above. I think they can be a useful part of the Lab.
I agree about the accountability thread. It's going to start feeling like talking to the wall.
And when you post a critique about someone's work and they thank you, it's good to "like" or "swinging" (or even "laugh" depending on what they say), their thank you. (Or I'm going to have to keep replying with GIFs and that's just going to get silly.)