- Thread starter
- #31
I don’t want to jump too soon on this, i.e. I really do want to get the new structure technically tied down and functioning well. But at some point, I would like to see how we might return to looking at the totality of a submission. Open for ideas.I can only speak for myself, but my MS isn't ready yet, otherwise, I would have been interested. It normally takes a massive effort to complete a book with ten fingers, with 1-3 fingers (on non-dominant hand) it's extra slow. I think it a grand idea, but not being able to talk also kinda kills the show too, lol!
There are several points-of-ethos that might be helpful, here goes -
* writers are regularly ripped off / offered poor value by a wide range of commercial propositions, from creative writing courses to manuscript review/ editing / critiquing services. I want to stand apart from this, i.e. offer extraordinary value.
* Concurrently, the commodification and commercialisation of writing skills is actually disempowering. Writing is like starting a revolution – no-one can give you the power to write, it has to be seized by confronting the barrel of a pen Ultimately, only you can teach yourself how to write.
* The more you put into a community such as this, the more you will get out of it. Critiquing someone else’s work doesn’t just benefit them, it hugely empowers you, too.