• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

Is it in bad taste to point out the symbolism and themes in your own work?

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's nae joke by the by...
iHRPGY7.jpg

If you don't get it...
 
I don't know if this is relevant, but an art history undergraduate once shared with me a quote from a famous artist/critic/somebody (sorry for the vagueness) to the effect that:

"any work of art, once released to the world, no longer belongs to the creator," (sic).

In this I understood him/her to mean that whatever intentions, themes and symbols you may have intended when you were creating, may or may not be recognisable to the recipient. Indeed other symbols and ideas may come to the reader or viewer that have nothing to do with the author/artist.

The intentions, both implicit and explicit, in our writing will always be there, but should we try to lead the reader to see them?
 
Last edited:
I don't know if this is relevant, but an art history undergraduate once shared a quote from a famous artist/critic/somebody (sorry for the vagueness) to the effect that:

"any work of art, once released to the world, no longer belongs to the creator," (sic).

In this I understood him/her to mean that whatever intentions, themes and symbols you may have intended when you were creating, they are may or may not be recognisable to the recipient. Indeed other symbols and ideas may come to the reader or viewer that have nothing to do with the author/artist.

The intentions, both implicit and explicit, in our writing will always be there, but should we try to lead the reader to see them?
Good point. 'Truth is a shattered mirror strewn, while each believes his little bit the whole to own'. Same with art I suppose.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Further Articles from the Author Platform

Latest Articles By Litopians

  • Plain Grocery Stores
    Right up the road from the Weaverland Auction, there’s an unnamed farm stand, its open front cover ...
  • Out and About when Autumn Leaves had Fallen
    Late November 2025… Mrs Treaclechops and I enjoyed a 5-day break in Pembrokeshire. We know the are ...
  • Twice as Sexy as Madonna
    When Richard and Cathie got together in the mid-eighties, they both thought it would last forever. T ...
  • If Plot Were an Artisan
    A vast and echoey chamber crisscrossed by delicate strands. PLOT hangs suspended from the high ceili ...
  • My accidental meeting with Brigitte Bardot
    So, last night, I noticed that Brigitte Bardot died, aged 91. As she is now dead, it seems a bit unf ...
  • Guilty displeasure
    It’s an odd hobby to have, being a writer. I liken it to something akin to a religious experience ...
  • Juxtaposition
    Themes War and peace, good versus evil, love-hate, rich and poor, kindness and selfishness, wisdom a ...
What Goes Around
Comes Around!
Back
Top