Paul Whybrow
Full Member
This article, from today's Guardian, is encouraging for those considering the self-publishing route, but raises as many questions as it answers:
Buying houses in cash and selling millions: meet self-publishing's 'hidden' authors
I agree with what Danuta Kean, the writer of the article, says about what's involved with self-promotion:
'To be a self-published bestseller demands authors become more hustler than ink slinger.'
I think, that one of the reasons that writers avoid self-publishing is that it requires a colossal ego to throw oneself into the self-promotion necessary to make a success of your book. It's not just the time-consuming schmoozing on YouTwitFace social media sites, a writer going it alone needs to really have faith that their novel is worthy of readers' attention.
It's impossible to be sufficiently objective about the quality of what one's written, which is why we seek validation in various ways. Sensibly, via the Colony, where erudite and friendly folk offer helpful advice.
Or, we do it through chasing elusive literary agents and stand-offish book publishers—if they're interested in your manuscript, then it must be half-decent.
Their interest is always more on the commercial potential of your story, rather than in making you feel like you're a literary talent that should be nurtured. Just because you've been offered representation by an agent, who's gone on to secure an offer of publication, it doesn't mean to say that either company will do all that they can to promote you as an author.
A writer, on the verge of signing a three-year contract, should look at the success rate of their agent and publisher in furthering the careers of their existing roster of clients. Many an author has regretted achieving the 'respectability' of being traditionally published, as their work wasn't sufficiently supported. They served their contract out or bought back the rights to their books, embarking on self-publishing.
There's still a chance of failure, but a self-published author has the freedom to learn and do something about it to improve things.
Buying houses in cash and selling millions: meet self-publishing's 'hidden' authors
I agree with what Danuta Kean, the writer of the article, says about what's involved with self-promotion:
'To be a self-published bestseller demands authors become more hustler than ink slinger.'
I think, that one of the reasons that writers avoid self-publishing is that it requires a colossal ego to throw oneself into the self-promotion necessary to make a success of your book. It's not just the time-consuming schmoozing on YouTwitFace social media sites, a writer going it alone needs to really have faith that their novel is worthy of readers' attention.
It's impossible to be sufficiently objective about the quality of what one's written, which is why we seek validation in various ways. Sensibly, via the Colony, where erudite and friendly folk offer helpful advice.
Or, we do it through chasing elusive literary agents and stand-offish book publishers—if they're interested in your manuscript, then it must be half-decent.
Their interest is always more on the commercial potential of your story, rather than in making you feel like you're a literary talent that should be nurtured. Just because you've been offered representation by an agent, who's gone on to secure an offer of publication, it doesn't mean to say that either company will do all that they can to promote you as an author.
A writer, on the verge of signing a three-year contract, should look at the success rate of their agent and publisher in furthering the careers of their existing roster of clients. Many an author has regretted achieving the 'respectability' of being traditionally published, as their work wasn't sufficiently supported. They served their contract out or bought back the rights to their books, embarking on self-publishing.
There's still a chance of failure, but a self-published author has the freedom to learn and do something about it to improve things.