E G Logan
Full Member
I have just found the following:
It lists literary agencies A-Z with the QM contact details for those agents using it. Because it gives only the absolute basics, it's necessary for the would-be querier to check out the agency and the agent. Which they should be doing anyway.
It does not sort the agencies in any way – e.g. size, location, scope (such as TV and scriptwriting included, or only children's, etc) – and it is careful to point out a listing is not an endorsement. As with all lists of this type, it seems to be up to the individual agents to keep their entry updated, hence one or two I've found are not.
Because of the brevity of the details, I've found it is time-consuming to use, with many false starts for agencies that specialise in areas other than what I'm looking for. And the number of agents who are now 'Closed to queries' or (my pet hate) 'Closed to unsolicited enquiries' ...!
Apologies if you already knew about this.
Who's Using QueryManager
querymanager.com
It lists literary agencies A-Z with the QM contact details for those agents using it. Because it gives only the absolute basics, it's necessary for the would-be querier to check out the agency and the agent. Which they should be doing anyway.
It does not sort the agencies in any way – e.g. size, location, scope (such as TV and scriptwriting included, or only children's, etc) – and it is careful to point out a listing is not an endorsement. As with all lists of this type, it seems to be up to the individual agents to keep their entry updated, hence one or two I've found are not.
Because of the brevity of the details, I've found it is time-consuming to use, with many false starts for agencies that specialise in areas other than what I'm looking for. And the number of agents who are now 'Closed to queries' or (my pet hate) 'Closed to unsolicited enquiries' ...!
Apologies if you already knew about this.