• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

Craft Chat CRAFT CHAT: Exposition and How to Avoid Overusing it

Status
Not open for further replies.

Carol Rose

Basic
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Location
Indiana, USA
LitBits
0
Exposition and How to Avoid Overusing it
What is exposition? The dictionary defines it as a comprehensive description and explanation of an idea or theory. Right off the bat, the definition alone tells you it sounds more suited to a textbook than a novel. A story. And yet, most beginning writers (and a few seasoned ones), use it liberally, especially at the beginning of a story.

In the writing world, exposition is also referred to as info dumping or telling. Obviously, if you tried to write an entire novel without some telling or exposition, it would be an exhausting endeavor, would be much too long for any publisher to consider, and would likely be difficult to read. There are times when it's perfectly acceptable to tell your readers something, or to give them snippets of information they need. Let's walk through those times, and ways to do it without drawing them into long, drawn-out paragraphs that might put them to sleep, or worse, cause them to abandon the book.

Let's talk about those all-important opening lines, since what applies to those also applies to using exposition throughout the story.

We're told to ground our readers in the Who, What, When, Where, and Why. All within the first page or two. Tough to do, right? Yes, it is. It's equally tough to do without simply listing it - without simply telling them, this is whose head you're in, this is where she is, this is why she's there, this is the year she's in, and this is what's going on.

Working on your opening lines is also important because they may be all a potential agent or publisher skims before making a decision to keep reading. If you can't hook people in the opening paragraphs, they're not going to keep reading. That's a cold, hard fact. The sooner you accept that as gospel truth in the writing world, the more work you'll put into crafting opening lines. And the more you work at it (just like anything), the better you'll become.


A word of caution here. What worked in 1783, 1824, 1921, or even 1976 will not work today. Language changes because it's fluid. Society changes. Expectations of readers change. Agents and publishers change with those shifts. They have to. If they can't sell a book, they do not make money. This is their job. That's another cold, hard fact you must accept. They aren't in business to coddle writers or to soothe their ruffled feathers. They're in business to make money, the same way you may go to a job five days a week to earn a paycheck so you can pay your bills and buy food and shelter.

That's why it's essential for a writer to understand their target market, understand the genre expectations in which they're writing, and understand the industry as it works today. Not thirty years ago. Not fifty years ago. Not two hundred years ago. Today. Why am I going on about this? Because I see all too often someone write a lovely story just as an author would have written it in times past, then bemoan the fact that no one wants to dredge through two chapters of introspective first person narrative before getting to the action in the story. Or, no one wants a prologue of nothing but exposition, setting up the entire backstory and history of what's going to happen in chapter four. Unless you're writing high fantasy, where the reader expectations are that you describe the entire history of the people in a long prologue, down to a description of the buttons on their coats, pages and pages of exposition are not going to be read by an agent or publisher.

And again, that's why it's essential to know your intended genre and its reader expectations. Know what's selling today. Sell the first book. Build up a reader base. Then you can experiment and push the boundaries. And if you're lucky and skilled at it, your readers will follow you.

Back to those important opening lines.

I'm a romance writer, and I'm published in an even tighter niche market - erotic romance. The openings of those books are expected to drop readers straight into the conflict of the heroine and/or hero. In other genres, you can get away with easing them in a bit more leisurely, but it's still a good idea to get into the habit of dropping them in the middle of something. By doing this, you can easily take care of the Who, What, When, Where, and Why, while also getting to the heart of the story.

Exposition (think of this as information, if that helps) and backstory are two things that should be dribbled in. You want to sprinkle it in places where it has relevance to the immediate or present action in the story. We'll talk about flashbacks in another post, so for now, we're talking about using information and backstory as your set up, or as transitions. I also tossed in the word conflict there. I don't want to veer off onto a tangent by talking about GMC - goal, motivation, and conflict, but it's very important you know your characters' GMC BEFORE you begin writing. Why? Well ... how can you drop them into the middle of the main conflict if you don't know what that conflict is?

EXAMPLE ONE

This is the opening paragraph from Bloodlust, the first book in my Unlicensed to Kill series. This book is published as Ravenna Tate by Evernight.

Digger had never been this nervous talking to Anthony LoPresti. He’d known the man his entire life, after all. But this was different. Tony wanted to know what had really happened to Roberto di Stefano. This was exactly what Digger had hoped would not happen. That others would start asking questions.

This book is a spin-off from my six-book series titled Demons on Wheels MC. My readers already know who Digger and Tony are, and they already know that Roberto di Stefano was killed, and that Digger and another man were responsible for the death. Digger is a hit man and Tony is a mob boss. They also know why Roberto was killed. I haven't grounded my readers in the Where or When here because I've made the assumption that they have read my Demons on Wheels MC series already. This is only an assumption I can get away with because this is my 95th publication, and I know my readers by now. I know they will stick with me past the first paragraph, even if it's a bit vague.

But, I have still grounded them in the Who, What, and Why. Digger is about to be grilled on a hit he did, by a man he's known all his life. A man who's important in Digger's life. A man who will want answers, no matter what. And we know Tony holds some authority over Digger because Digger is nervous about these questions. Let's read on... (and excuse the cuss words, please!)

“Wouldn’t you have heard if it was a hit?” He hated lying to Tony, but it wasn’t something he could tell anyone. Not ever. He’d have to take the real story to his grave.

“Yeah. That’s what has me bothered. I heard nothing. From no one.”

“Neither did I.” He was going to hell for sure. He’d just told the man half a dozen outright fucking lies in the space of less than ten minutes.

I went straight to dialogue in my next paragraphs, and it accomplished the Big Three Things: it showed characterization, it moved the story forward, and it gave the reader important information. Where I did use narrative, or exposition, it was immediate and relevant to the dialogue. Let's break it down further.

I've told the reader this is a lie, but I did so after the evasive lie Digger told Tony - "Wouldn't you have heard if it was a hit?" He hated lying to Tony, but it wasn’t something he could tell anyone. Not ever. He’d have to take the real story to his grave.

I've also told them that Digger has no intentions of ever telling Tony the true story. The reader already knows the true story, unless they didn't read my Demons on Wheels MC series. But even if they have not, they have more information now, and they know a bit more about both Tony and Digger. But instead of simply putting all this in narrative, I've given it to them via dialogue. That brings me to an important piece of advice about sprinkling in exposition. Framing it with dialogue is a lot more interesting to read.

“Yeah. That’s what has me bothered. I heard nothing. From no one.” This is Tony speaking. He's not an idiot. He likely knows Digger is lying or at least being evasive. I don't have to tell the reader this. They get it from the context of the previous two paragraphs, and from the way in which Tony says these lines to Digger.

“Neither did I.” He was going to hell for sure. He’d just told the man half a dozen outright fucking lies in the space of less than ten minutes. One more time, just for fun, I let the reader know Digger has lied - and this time I tell them how much - to mob boss Tony. And Digger knows he has, but now the reader understands that keeping the secret is more important than keeping his loyalty to Tony. They already know Digger has known Tony all his life. I told them that in the opening paragraph. They now also know he is willing to lie to this man to keep the real story of the hit a secret.

We're only halfway down the first page of the book and we have a lot of information about Digger as a person. We also have information about his relationship with Tony. As I said, I could get away with a bit less grounding of my readers in this one because of the prior books. So let's take a look at a book where I needed to first squarely ground my readers, because this was book one in a brand new series.


EXAMPLE TWO

This is the opening from my first Ravenna Tate book, Kidnapped By A Warrior, which was my 59th publication by then. It's book one of a four-book erotic sci-fi romance series. As you can see, I spent more time with the What, When, Where, Who, and Why. Reading this now, though, I feel I could have cut back on the setup even more and made this opening much more immediate.

It had been six months, seven days, and two hours since the world as Callie O’Doyle had known it ended. And she was still no closer to finding a decent job than she’d been before the day of the first invasion, so she could hardly blame her current state on them. They called themselves the Tyranns, but Callie called them the asshole aliens, like most people she heard talk about them did.

Her parents and both sisters had been taken in the first invasion, and the few friends who were left and hadn’t gone into hiding were too scared to come outside any more than was absolutely necessary. But Callie still had bills to pay, at least until the water, electricity, and heat stopped worked in her apartment, so she needed to find a better job.

Everyone referred to it as the first invasion because it was common knowledge the Tyranns had landed in other cities around the globe, but according to the news reports they’d been able to receive before most of the cable and local television stations went offline, their tiny city had been the site of the first landing.

She stood in front of the squat, brick building, debating. This wasn’t her dream job. But then, there weren’t many of those left so she had to give this her best shot. It wasn’t like the world had a huge need for art history majors these days, any more than it had before they landed on the planet and changed human life forever. She’d take what she could get right now, and try to survive.

The foyer smelled faintly of boiled cabbage, which made her wonder who lived upstairs. The door to the so-called gallery was open, so she walked in and glanced around. Just as Callie was about to turn around and leave, she heard footsteps from behind a partition.


We have dialogue in the next paragraph, but as I said, it takes me a while to get there. What I should have done was move the next paragraph, where Callie meets the gallery owner, to the third paragraph. The rest of the setup/backstory should have come after a few lines between Callie and the gallery owner. Below is their initial exchange. As you can see, the reader is given a lot of characterization for both Callie and the gallery owner, as well as important information about what came before in this story. But it's accomplished through dialogue instead of narrative. Where there is narrative, it's short and relevant to what is being said out loud by the two characters.

A woman Callie guessed was in her fifties but who walked like she was much older shuffled out, took off her glasses, and smiled, showing a couple of missing teeth. “Are you Callie O’Doyle?”

Callie forced a smile to her face and walked toward the woman, hand extended. “Yes, I am.”

“I’m Lizzy Anderson. Welcome to my place. It’s not very big, but I’m afraid the space we used to occupy is ... no longer there.”

“Where was it?”

The woman nodded in the general direction of the street. “Charles Street.”

“Oh...” Charles Street, in addition to most of the harbor area, no longer existed. The first invasion had blasted it to smithereens, along with anyone who had been unfortunate enough to be close to or inside any of the buildings at the time.

“It was a beautiful place, but we were new and I’m afraid I wasn’t able to save any of the works we had acquired, although I did try that day.”

Callie glanced again at the bad reproductions on the walls, her heart going out to this sad woman who was trying to start a business at a time like this.

“After I got out of the hospital, I found these pictures in the Walmart across town. You know. The one missing sections of roofing. They were just lying there. No one wanted them. I know they’re not real, but do you really think anyone will know that? I mean, we know it, but is there anyone left who will really care?”

Callie put a hand to her mouth and stared at Lizzy. “You were there that day. It was your gallery on Charles Street.” New Concepts. That had been the name of the gallery, and it hadn’t even opened yet. She’d been drooling over it ever since she found out it would soon grace their once-beautiful harbor area, because they had desperately needed a real gallery in this town.

The woman’s expression grew cold. “Yes. Yes, I was. But I was one of the lucky ones. I survived.”


This takes us to the end of page two in the book. I've ticked all the boxes. Who, What, When, Where, and Why. I've dropped Callie into the middle of her conflict. I've shown readers who she is as a person, and I've given readers the basic setup for Callie's world today, and how it came to be that way. And, I've done all that with only a few paragraphs of straight narrative at the beginning of the story. If I was rewriting this today, I'd move some of that dialogue closer to the beginning.

So, how does an author decide what exposition belongs in the story, and what is really not needed?

Over the years, I've developed a litmus test of sorts. I've gleaned this from various sources, and it may or may not work for everyone. And to be honest, I still sometimes struggle with this as a writer. I don't think this is something that's always easy or quick to get a handle on, because each story is unique.

How much exposition is too much? Have I gone on long enough by now? Do my readers really need to know this?

My general test for any piece of narrative that goes on longer than one paragraph is this:

  1. Does this give the reader necessary information to further ground them?
  2. Does this show new characterization?
  3. Does this move the story forward?
  4. Can I accomplish any of the above with either dialogue or action instead?
Pretty much the same as the Big Three Things we want to accomplish with dialogue, but with an added twist. I ask myself if this bit of exposition can be stated in a better way - through dialogue or with action. If I decide it's best left as it is, I still try to trim it down a bit, or move some of it around so it's framed by dialogue or action.

So let's summarize...

Exposition, info dumping, narrative, backstory are all essentially the same thing. Extraneous information that may or may not be necessary to the story. The writer uses it to let the reader know something. Things that happened before the story started, things that shaped who the characters are today, or things the characters are feeling or thinking. But sometimes, this information is not critical to the story. It's only filler.

Using exposition anywhere in the story should still accomplish something each time. It should give the reader necessary information that can't be better shown through dialogue or action instead. It should move the story forward, not merely act as filler or fluff. And it should tell them something which reinforces the dialogue around it, or which will become relevant very soon. Otherwise, it doesn't belong there.

One more quick thing I want to add. When submitting to Pop-Up Submissions, we only send @AgentPete the first 700 words. If you've watched any of them, you know that's all we have to make a judgement on, because that's the average amount of words an agent or publisher will read before deciding to pass or keep going.

From my two examples up there, the second one is 668 words. Just to give you some perspective on how much you need to jam into those all-important opening pages. :)

Now let's talk about it. Let's discuss exposition and ways to use it.
 
I'm going to re-read this several times. Thank you for posting. At some point I'd love a discussion of 3rd person POV too. Is it acceptable to have only one character's POV throughout the entire book? So far I dip into the heads of only the 3 main characters, but wondering if the suspense might be greater just having through one person's view point.
 
I'm going to re-read this several times. Thank you for posting. At some point I'd love a discussion of 3rd person POV too. Is it acceptable to have only one character's POV throughout the entire book? So far I dip into the heads of only the 3 main characters, but wondering if the suspense might be greater just having through one person's view point.

Thanks, Rachel! We'll add that to the list of posts! :)
 
Thanks Carol - very timely! Just in the process of adding in (and then mostly taking out again!) the exposition I've been told I need for polishing my manuscript. My litmus test at the moment is to listen back to what I've written and see if I'm bored. It's often just that one line too many in a paragraph that tips it over the edge. I've also tried using flashbacks, but that can slow things down dreadfully too.
 
Thanks Carol - very timely! Just in the process of adding in (and then mostly taking out again!) the exposition I've been told I need for polishing my manuscript. My litmus test at the moment is to listen back to what I've written and see if I'm bored. It's often just that one line too many in a paragraph that tips it over the edge. I've also tried using flashbacks, but that can slow things down dreadfully too.

SO difficult to do with our own writing, too! My hat's off to you for being able to discern that. :) Flashbacks are an entirely different animal, aren't they? Closely related, but dealing with them effectively involves a different skill set.
 
@Carol Rose, Thank you for this. I think you're illustrating rather well how we should consciously use craft when we write. I didn't use to. I used to write on the wind, but I find by making deliberate writing choices, my writing improves. I'm now planting information at strategic places, and use certain tools, cookies, character crisis ect. to craft my novel. (Whether I'm succeeding or not is another thing. Time will tell.)

Ah, exposition.

I like your Litmus test. It's something I do too.

In the very first novel I wrote, I explained everything. Twice, at least. Then I realised that my verbal diarrhoea partly came down to trust (or lack of); trust that the reader is still with me; trust in my own story telling. I wanted to cram everything in to make sure the readers 'get it what I was trying to show'. It was yawn worthy. Back then I wrote on the hoof.

In novel number two I went the opposite way and Agent Pete said during my pop up that my sub was a bit sparse. I was still wroting on the hoof, but I just wrote less.

OK, time for a happy medium. Time to put some thought into the writing process.

Novel number three: I'm still economical with expo and BS (backstory), or at least I am in draft one of a scene. I tell myself that I can always add more later if I feel I need to deepen the plot, or character, or setting etc, and if so, then I ask myself: Is this piece of information relevant to the understanding of the story, or the character? If do find I have to add the info, I try to find a creative way of showing it.

I think the trick is to put relevant information into a story in a way that it isn't noticed. I also use dialogue, but I'm very careful that in doesn't come across as contrived or planted, but that it's invisible. And I use action. By action I mean that my characters use the ‘set’ around them; their surroundings, the same way I (as an actor) would use the props around me to help show how I feel.

Finally, I also follow Agent Pete's mantra of more 'meaning from less words'. Make every single word count. Having to fit a specific word count also makes me conscious of not pouring every bit of detail into the story. No time for hooting owls and pink sunsets.

In my acting days, someone once told me: if information is not in the play, it's not important to the audience even if it's important to you as an actor. Meaning backstory might be important for us story tellers to know how a character ticks, but the audience doesn't necessarily need to know every bit of info.

It's hard, isn't it. As authors we don't have a feel for our audience. We don't know if they're still with us or if they're fast asleep. As actors (stage at least) we can pick up the energy in the auditorium and know if they're hanging on our every word or snoozing on their seat-neighbour’s shoulders. As authors we're sort of blind. I think it comes down to knowing what information is essential then leave out the rest.
 
Last edited:
I love the play analogy, because in a screenplay, or when presenting a play or movie on a stage or screen, you only have a limited amount of time. You're forced to make each word and each action count. We have a bit more leeway in a book, but as a reader, I'm far less inclined to plough through pages of filler that don't give me anything essential.

That being said, I've run across authors who are so skilled at narrative that it takes a while to realize they're using exposition. Those authors, though, are few and far between. And even in those instances, if I go back and analyze it (yes, I'm a geek like that! LOL!), I realize their exposition really did have a purpose. :)

Yes, as authors, it's difficult to tell if we're boring our potential readers, because all that stuff we wrote is terribly important to us. That's why it's usually a good idea to put the MS aside and return to it later with fresh eyes. :)
 
Thank you. I often approach writing from an acting perspective. I think it helps me not to flood the writing with too much expo. In a play no one stands off to the side and then tells the story (apart from some Greek tragedy). Everyone is actively involved. But that does mean my work tends to be dialogue heavy.
 
Thank you. I often approach writing from an acting perspective. I think it helps me not to flood the writing with too much expo. In a play no one stands off to the side and then tells the story (apart from some Greek tragedy). Everyone is actively involved. But that does mea my work tends to be dialogue heavy.

Dialogue is great as long as it accomplishes something. :)

Ah the Greek Tragedy. LOL!! Gotta love it though, right? ;)
 
This is very timely for me. I don't have time to read it now, but will do later today.
If anyone's looking for a good example, I very recently took some Litopians' excellent advice on a rewrite, taking a slab of dull exposition, splitting it up and putting into the mouth of a character. It's made a world of difference. I knew was a difficult chapter - the info has to go in, for the rest of the story to make sense - but I struggled to make it right. Adding that character has revolutionised the way it reads, and probably turned the whole thing around. Best of all, it was so much easier to write than so much endless struggling to make a few words of explanation work in the context of a first-person character telling the reader so much stuff.
 
This is very timely for me. I don't have time to read it now, but will do later today.
If anyone's looking for a good example, I very recently took some Litopians' excellent advice on a rewrite, taking a slab of dull exposition, splitting it up and putting into the mouth of a character. It's made a world of difference. I knew was a difficult chapter - the info has to go in, for the rest of the story to make sense - but I struggled to make it right. Adding that character has revolutionised the way it reads, and probably turned the whole thing around. Best of all, it was so much easier to write than so much endless struggling to make a few words of explanation work in the context of a first-person character telling the reader so much stuff.

Glad you found it helpful! :)
 
This is very timely for me. I don't have time to read it now, but will do later today.
If anyone's looking for a good example, I very recently took some Litopians' excellent advice on a rewrite, taking a slab of dull exposition, splitting it up and putting into the mouth of a character. It's made a world of difference. I knew was a difficult chapter - the info has to go in, for the rest of the story to make sense - but I struggled to make it right. Adding that character has revolutionised the way it reads, and probably turned the whole thing around. Best of all, it was so much easier to write than so much endless struggling to make a few words of explanation work in the context of a first-person character telling the reader so much stuff.
Yes, I was amazingly impressed how you changed it.
 
I'm very anti exposition. My own approach is to try and deliver information narratively i.e. with something happening, rather than telling the reader. If I have to tell the reader something I will, but I'll avoid it if I can.

Excess exposition is rampant in the genre I read and write in; Sci-Fi.

I think it comes from a failure to understand that the worlds we create are not real. Exposition is common in textbooks as it delivers facts about things that are real. If in a textbook you were to read that 100,000 people died in a war you didn't know much about, you might find that interesting because real people died. There were real consequences.

If I tell you that 20 billion quasari died in the destruction of a far off planet you wouldn't care. I was having a chat about this with a fellow Litopian recently and I drafted the below as an example;

The Balthasari Republic on Balthas V were founded in the Earth year 2365. We had not discovered the Balthas system then, but they knew of us. The Balthasari built their war machine and slaughtered the Earth's forces 2374. It was a massacre. The Balthasari defeated the United Super Corps within a week, the rest of Earth's armies fell shortly after. Then the gruelling occupation began. The Balthasari enslaved humans and transported them to their far space colonies to mine Trihulium. Most died in those brutal mines within a few days. Those that endured became known as the Trihulium hardcore. Yet their perseverance only strengthened the Balthasari's iron grip back home. Trihulium was a vital resource in Balthasari weaponry and they used it on Earth's resistance to deadly effect. We fought hard, taking down their supply lines and encampments in bomb attacks. Our victories were small, but their scarcity made them feel huge. And so on...

The above is utter rubbish and I can say that because I wrote it. It's just a list of fake facts. Unfortunately the genre doesn't help itself. Often popular Sci-Fi/Fantasy books are crammed with lore in the appendices and novice writers who are fans of these books love all the facts in the back. So they think; why not shove all this info in the front?

Unfortunately they fail to understand that you have to get your readers to invest in the world first so that it becomes real in their mind. You do this with powerful characterisation and a strong story, once your readers believe in the world a list of fake facts like the above becomes interesting because it's become real to your reader.

To me, two recent great examples of this are;

1. A tweet about Harry Potter made national news on my sky news app. Apparently, before Muggle studies revealed the toilet, wizards used to pee in the corridors and vanish the remains.

2. G.R.R Martin got Tesco's (a national supermarket) to stock a huge tome of a fictional history of Valeria.

Those two writers have managed to get mainstream outlets to float their lore because in the minds of public these worlds have become real. They've achieved this with incredible stories and characters, which we care so much about, that the world in which they inhabit has become important to us, because we want those characters and stories to survive.

Story first, exposition last.
 
I have serious problems with setting and description - associated with exposition - and try very hard to only put in enough for the reader to grasp hold of their perceptions to fill it in. Doesn't always work (especially for YA, apparently), so I'm looking to find new ways to put in just that little bit more, not too much, seasoned just ever so slightly and only in the scenes where it's absolutely necessary.

But I also like to leave holes (or loops, as I refer to them) so the reader has to think - or maybe that's the problem? Too many holes, not enough coverage?
Well, just have to keep testing the boundaries, see what works in each story, and work at making each story better than the last ...:)
 
The more I write, the less exposition I tend to use. My first novel contained LOADS of exposition, but my latest novel contained far less. And the space opera that I’ve rewritten twice shed pages of exposition with each pass.

I’ve found that it’s fairly easy to insert a sentence here or a sentence there to give a bit of backstory without going over the edge. And I’ve developed a fairly lean style because of it. Hell, I’ve managed to go from writing novels that started with pages of exposition to ones that start with action on the first page.

And thanks @Carol Rose for putting this together. Appreciate your knowledge and experience!
 
@Robert M Derry has deftly illustrated another important point in my original post - know your genre and its reader expectations. :)

Sci-fi is one of those genres where the readers need and want all that history and backstory. It's part of the world-building. The more unlike our modern-day Earth your story setting is, the more world-building you need to do.

But if you think about it, even when you're writing a modern-day story set in a city just about everyone is familiar with, you're still world-building, even if you're not consciously aware of it.

You might name a familiar building in that city. You might talk about someone using a cell phone, or looking up something online. And when you write these things, you don't explain them. You don't write: Johnny pulled his phone out of his pocket and opened Google maps. His phone was a communication device that was invented decades earlier, and enabled the people of Earth to talk to each other, even if they were thousands of miles away. It also let them access the Internet, which was a world-wide connectivity of information and electronic communication. At least I hope you don't... LOL! :)

Light bulbs just went off, didn't they?

You would never go to such lengths to explain this because you assume everyone knows what Google maps is, what a cell (mobile) phone is, and what the Internet is. But you have inserted some world-building in there, just the same, have you not? Cell phones, Google maps, and the Internet are part of our modern-day world. Yes, that is still world-building. :)

So, do the same thing when you write that sci-fi book. Yes. It will work.

Start with the assumption that these concepts - whatever you're about to write - are part of the world in which you've set your story. Then just drop them in there, with enough context that your readers will understand what they are and how they're used.

Does that take some thinking and some skill? Yes. But it's not impossible. And at most... AT MOST... drop a quick line or two of exposition in there ONLY if you need to. Something related to whatever it is your character is doing, and what they're using that thing for. Not just filler or history for the sake of history, but to ground your reader. And again, only if you really need to. Only if the context doesn't make it clear.

For example, let's say your character is operating a space ship. Most readers have seen enough Star Trek and related TV shows or movies to understand the basics of what it would take to operate a space ship that's way ahead of our current ships. You don't need to explain the history of this particular vessel to your readers, or detail how it operates. You simply assume the operation of it is part of the world in which you're writing, and you have your character go through the motions. Your readers aren't stupid. They'll get it. They'll picture it. Toss in a few technical words here or there, show them navigating, plotting a course, maybe communicating with whoever they need to, and your readers will be grounded. That's really all they need, isn't it? The same way you'd describe someone driving a car in a contemporary story. You don't need to explain the car or its history. Your readers grasp the basic concept.

Or, let's take the example of wanting to toss in some history of the world you've created, so your readers understand it. And again, this assumes they first need to understand it in order to grasp something important in the story. You might toss in a line something like this: As she walked among the charred stumps of wood, the smell of burned plants still hung in the air. A constant reminder of the Klang's attack which had destroyed nearly all the vegetation and crops decades ago. If this planet had rain more than twice a year, the smell might be gone by now.

I just made that up off the top of my head, but hopefully it illustrates what I'm trying to say. You have your characters' sensations while performing an action, and then the exposition I toss in backs it up with a bit of history, as well as important information about the climate that might foreshadow something later in the story. Something the character needs to know, and something my readers need to know. And the exposition is kept to a minimum, as well as keeping it relevant to the action of the character in the moment.

@CageSage setting is another animal altogether. I'll add this to the list of Craft Chat posts. I think it's a great topic to discuss. :)

@Chase Gamwell I think it's easy as a newer writer to start with exposition, because we're trying so hard to get all those boxes ticked, and we believe it's important for our readers to understand absolutely everything that came before, in this world we've created, before the story starts.
 
In writing a series of novels featuring the same protagonist, a detective called Neil Kettle, I've had to include a certain amount of exposition about him, to explain why he behaves as he does. For example, after being widowed, he was descending into depression in Book 1 and by Book 2 he was having panic attacks, disrupted sleep and doubting everything he did, all while running the hunt for a serial killer.

He was named after his uncle, a man he never met, who committed suicide by hanging himself in a barn on his farm. Neil feels haunted by his fate, worrying that he'll be taken over by the black dog again. His compassion affects how he commands his detectives and how he divines the motivations of the criminals he investigates.

I don't insert too much back story, just enough to indicate his nature and provide a reminder of his history to loyal readers (who dey? :rolleyes:)

Judging how much exposition to use in a series is tricky sometimes. We want a character arc to continue from story to story, but it's also important that the latest tale works as a stand-alone book for those not interested in the prequels and sequels.

When I returned to creative writing in 2013, penning short stories, novellas and my first Cornish Detective novel, I swiftly decided to self-publish them on Smashwords. I learnt much about formatting and marketing e-books from Smashwords' founder Mark Coker. He's a big fan of using hyperlinks to convey information.

The plot of my first novel featured a serial killer antagonist, who'd be made into a soulless killing machine by being forcibly conscripted at the age of 14 to fight in the Serbian War of Independence. Rather than go into a detailed exposition of the atrocities he'd endured and perpetrated, I used hyperlinks to Wikipedia articles on the battles and massacres.

The drawback of using hyperlinks is that encouraging your reader away from your story, onto the Internet, might mean they don't return. Also, it can come across as giving a lecture. Finally, it looks horrible on the page, as if you've been colouring in certain words with a marker pen!

In recent editing sweeps, I've removed all the highlighted hyperlinks. If a reader wants to find out more about a subject unfamiliar to them, it's easy enough to go online to investigate.

I rather miss the use of footnotes and appendices, which novelists once used to convey information. In recent years, the only authors I can think of who used footnotes are Susanna Clarke in Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell and David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest.
 
I'm not sure what you mean about hyperlinks. Do you mean you inserted places in the text where a reader could go back and look up, for example, certain keywords found throughout the book or series? I can't say I've ever seen that in a novel. Same with footnotes. I suppose there might be good reasons to use them, but for me as a reader, I'd think them unnecessary and over-the-top. I'm reading a story to ... you know ... read it. Not research it. :)

In a long-running series it can be tricky grounding your readers without a lot of exposition to explain what came before. You have to almost assume people are going to read the entire series in order. Long chunks of exposition to "catch readers up" can be tedious for both you and the reader. I'd caution against it. As with everything else we've discussed here, less is definitely more.

Some authors list the books, in reading order, at the beginning of each book in a series. They may also add a line about how this series is best read in order. On my Ravenna Tate Amazon page, in my book list, I do this. I tell readers whether this is a stand-alone series or whether it's best rest in order.

I have one 12-book series that most definitely needs to be read in order, otherwise you are lost. The story arc progresses forward through each book, and it doesn't end until the last book. And yes, even though that was made clear from the beginning of that series, I still got reviewers who mentioned how lost they were because they picked up book four first. SIGH There's nothing you can do about that as an author. There's a few of those in every crowd. ;)

You can also publish a companion book, like many well-known authors of long-running series have done. I believe Outlander has two such books. It's a compilation the author puts together for the very purposes you're describing. Character lists, history, background, who's who, etc.

As I wrote my Racy Nights series as Tara Rose for Siren-BookStrand, and when I still had Tara's website up and running, I had a Who's Who in Racy page that accomplished the same thing. That was a 15-book series, so I felt it was needed, but Siren wouldn't let me put anything in the front of the books.

The page on my website listed the major and minor players in each book of the Racy Nights series, who they are, how they're related to everyone else, and how they're related in general to the town. It also listed the history of the town (since it was a made-up town), and tidbits like that. At the back of each book, my website was listed, so at least readers had that for a reference. The page was prominently displayed in the Pages heading on the landing page of my website.

Since your series is so involved, you might consider something like that. A separate page on your website that describes everyone and everything in the series.
 
Glad you found it helpful! :)
Very much so and many thanks for it.

instead of simply putting all this in narrative, I've given it to them via dialogue. That brings me to an important piece of advice about sprinkling in exposition. Framing it with dialogue is a lot more interesting to read.
More interesting to read and, certainly for me, a lot easier to write too. Once I'd found a character, I could bounce the ideas I needed to include in the form of dialogue. I could see the scene I was describing very clearly. Instead of a talking-head, speaking into camera (so to speak ), I had a small group of characters, in a setting, talking to each like real people. It's completely changed the feel of the chapter and very much for the better.
 
Yes, I was amazingly impressed how you changed it.
You've been incredibly kind throughout.
The thing I liked best about this particular process was how adding a character and having him give all that necessary info in a short conversation, was so much easier to write than forcing my protagonist to explain. Once I had a new character, the scene just flowed with very little effort. It also sparked all manner of new ideas, little hints and nods that I'm going to thread through the rest of the novel. It's improved the sense of mystery at the start, and will hopefully add a bit of fresh sparkle to what comes after. I can't thank everyone who commented enough, you've really helped me make a radical difference to what's always been a boring passage in a tricky chapter.

I really would encourage anyone having problems with exposition to post their work in the writing groups. It's been enormously helpful to me.
 
Last edited:
I'm writing a novel that starts with a prologue before going straight into story ... I think the prologue is really important to the overall story although essentially it is a brief look at a town through its pubs and the types of groups that use each pub ... everyone says I should drop it but I think it works ... as a sort of metaphor for the town and the storts of people who live there plus the story is about how heroin first comes into a small town back in the late 70s ... would it be worth showing you the offending piece to get feedback? what is the best way to go about this? I am obviously at a very early stage in the novel... still haven't finished first draft etc I've written about 60,000 wds. Is it a good idea to show it at this early stage?
 
I'm writing a novel that starts with a prologue before going straight into story ... I think the prologue is really important to the overall story although essentially it is a brief look at a town through its pubs and the types of groups that use each pub ... everyone says I should drop it but I think it works ... as a sort of metaphor for the town and the storts of people who live there plus the story is about how heroin first comes into a small town back in the late 70s ... would it be worth showing you the offending piece to get feedback? what is the best way to go about this? I am obviously at a very early stage in the novel... still haven't finished first draft etc I've written about 60,000 wds. Is it a good idea to show it at this early stage?
I wish I had. It would have saved me about a year of angst. Post your stuff in the writing groups.
 
Yes, usually lots of people weigh in, and give their thoughts, which is scary, but fantastic because you can see recurring criticisms.
I'd post the first two or three chapters if you're wondering whether your prologue works, so people can see how it would open without it.
You attach the word doc and people download it.
 
Yes, usually lots of people weigh in, and give their thoughts, which is scary, but fantastic because you can see recurring criticisms.
I'd post the first two or three chapters if you're wondering whether your prologue works, so people can see how it would open without it.
You attach the word doc and people download it.
thank you Leonora ... I'll get onto that in the next couple of days ... I'm still finding my way around this sight ... all sorts of cubby holes here!!
 
You need to have posted a certain number of posts, but I expect you have by now. If so, writing groups will appear on your forum list. If not, you'll need to post until it appears - someone will be able to tell you how many posts are required.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top