Amazon-Hachette Debate Yields Diverse Opinions Among Authors

Book Review: Boyhood

L

New show: The Devil – Leo Tolstoy

Status
Not open for further replies.

AgentPete

Capo Famiglia
Guardian
Full Member
May 19, 2014
London UK
I’m going to paste in its entirety (with a nod to copyright concerns – I think they want this seen far and wide!) the following from The Authors’ Guild... and then add a few comments of my own.

The Authors Guild is committed to an inclusive, big-tent approach to its mission as the published writer’s advocate. The recent clash between Amazon and Hachette Book Group has called attention to the contrasting viewpoints of traditionally-published and self-published authors. During this dispute the Guild has spoken out against Amazon’s tactics—which needlessly imperil the livelihoods of authors who are not involved in the negotiations—while also challenging the major publishing houses to revisit the parsimonious stance they’ve taken on authors’ e-book royalties.

The Guild recognizes all authors’ rights to make a living from their books and to pursue the most suitable audience for them. It is a sign of the strength and diversity of our membership that two of our Council Members, Douglas Preston and CJ Lyons, have taken different public stands in defense of serious authors.

Douglas Preston has composed an open letter to Amazon calling on the corporation to resolve the dispute without further hurting Hachette authors. “Without taking sides on the contractual dispute between Hachette and Amazon,” Preston writes, “we encourage Amazon in the strongest possible terms to stop harming the livelihoods of the authors on whom it has built its business.”

In response to Preston’s letter to Amazon, self-published authors circulated a petition to Hachette asking it to “work on a resolution that keeps e-book prices reasonable and pays authors a fair wage.” Authors Guild Council Member CJ Lyons was a prominent signatory. In a cover letter addressed to their readers, the self-published writers praised Amazon for keeping prices low and the Amazon platforms for “giving all writers a chance to reach an audience.”

After these letters had been circulated, Authors Guild co-Vice President Richard Russo published an open letter taking the long view, noting that the outcome of the present dispute is dwarfed by the need for a healthy publishing landscape that can support a diverse and inclusive community of authors. “The primary mission of the Authors Guild has always been the defense of the writing life,” he began. “What we care about is a healthy [literary] ecosystem where all writers, both traditionally and independently published, can thrive.”

One way or another the Amazon-Hachette dispute will be resolved, but the issue of fair compensation for authors will remain a central concern to the Guild. “We’re committed to supporting working writers,” says Authors Guild President Roxana Robinson. “Writers should be able to make a living at what they do – which is to provide an essential contribution to society. However the publishing world changes, writers will still be crucial to it. No matter how the written word is distributed, only writers can write. They deserve respect and support.”

+++



OK, that’s their statement. Now here’s mine...

  • Dissension among the ranks of authors can’t help the situation.
  • Authors have by definition never spoken with one voice.
  • Is anyone really listening to what authors’ think? I mean, will consumers boycott Amazon? Really?
  • My greatest fear, and one that I think will come to pass, is that Amazon will slowly but surely drop their 70% royalty rate on ebooks. That will cause real pain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Book Review: Boyhood

L

New show: The Devil – Leo Tolstoy

Back
Top