Paul Whybrow
Full Member
I was looking through the articles on books in the Guardian newspaper, finding this interesting piece in the archive about writers and vanity, written by Julian Baggini, a British philosopher.
http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2015/feb/25/writers-vain-egotism-julian-baggini
( some great stories on writing beneath this article, and do read the comments section )
One of the first pieces of advice that I'd give to anyone considering writing a book, is to develop a hide as thick as a rhinoceros. Everyone thinks that they've got a book inside them, but nobody considers what will happen when the book is released into the wild!
Being an author is setting yourself up as a target for criticism and rejection. These brickbats will come from complete strangers, friends, family, readers, publishers, book-sellers and critics. That's if they say anything at all, for being completely ignored is the usual fate of a freshly published book. This is why writers welcome adverse criticism, as at least it means that someone has noticed you.
Ego and self-confidence aren't the same thing. We have to believe that we can write a story, or it simply won't exist. As Rumi observed : 'Don't be satisfied with stories, how things have gone with others. Unfold your own myth.'
Being over-egotistical is a sure way of suffocating any talent that one may have. Talent needs cold and clear objectivity to be honed until it's sharp and bright.
How do the Colonists deal with self-confidence, ego, arrogance, hubris, self-belief and vanity?
http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2015/feb/25/writers-vain-egotism-julian-baggini
( some great stories on writing beneath this article, and do read the comments section )
One of the first pieces of advice that I'd give to anyone considering writing a book, is to develop a hide as thick as a rhinoceros. Everyone thinks that they've got a book inside them, but nobody considers what will happen when the book is released into the wild!
Being an author is setting yourself up as a target for criticism and rejection. These brickbats will come from complete strangers, friends, family, readers, publishers, book-sellers and critics. That's if they say anything at all, for being completely ignored is the usual fate of a freshly published book. This is why writers welcome adverse criticism, as at least it means that someone has noticed you.
Ego and self-confidence aren't the same thing. We have to believe that we can write a story, or it simply won't exist. As Rumi observed : 'Don't be satisfied with stories, how things have gone with others. Unfold your own myth.'
Being over-egotistical is a sure way of suffocating any talent that one may have. Talent needs cold and clear objectivity to be honed until it's sharp and bright.
How do the Colonists deal with self-confidence, ego, arrogance, hubris, self-belief and vanity?