Allan Hunter
Basic
I'm rereading Stone Butch Blues and taking note once again of the disclaimer at the beginning: "This is a work of fiction. Any similarities between characters and people, dead or alive, is a coincidence". I'm reminded that Rubyfruit Jungle was also marketed as a work of fiction -- but in both cases it is widely understood that the works are actually autobiographical in nature. Molly Bolt was Rita Mae Brown herself. Jess Goldberg is really Leslie Feinberg. To toss in a third example, Who Was That Masked Woman by Noretta Koertge features a main character named Tretona Getroek and is, once again, purportedly a work of fiction.
* To what extent is this generally done only to avoid defamation-of-character lawsuits by people who might claim they were the real people on whom one of the characters in the book were based?
* Under what circumstances is a typical publisher going to regard that as a low enough risk that they'd be OK putting the manuscript out there as a work of nonfiction (memoir)? I know that anyone can sue anyone for anything, regardless of their chances of getting anywhere in the courtroom. Assume for the sake of argument that all the names are changed and that no character with egregious or embarrassing behavior is portrayed in such a way that anyone could pinpoint who the actual person was. Are most publishers going to nevertheless want the book marketed as fiction to avoid lawsuits?
* In contrast, to what extent is this pretense-of-fiction being done by the authors in order to get a publishing contract? In other words, is there reason to believe they'd have a difficult time getting their stories published if they had described them as "memoirs" in their query letters? I have noticed that authors of nonfiction are expected to have a "platform" (to be a bit of a household word or to have a following) in a way that is not expected of fiction authors, and that memoirs are expected to be about someone that folks have already heard of, as opposed to being "Example A" of some phenomenon (being a coal miner, being an autistic person, being a gay person in the military, whatever).
* To what extent is this generally done only to avoid defamation-of-character lawsuits by people who might claim they were the real people on whom one of the characters in the book were based?
* Under what circumstances is a typical publisher going to regard that as a low enough risk that they'd be OK putting the manuscript out there as a work of nonfiction (memoir)? I know that anyone can sue anyone for anything, regardless of their chances of getting anywhere in the courtroom. Assume for the sake of argument that all the names are changed and that no character with egregious or embarrassing behavior is portrayed in such a way that anyone could pinpoint who the actual person was. Are most publishers going to nevertheless want the book marketed as fiction to avoid lawsuits?
* In contrast, to what extent is this pretense-of-fiction being done by the authors in order to get a publishing contract? In other words, is there reason to believe they'd have a difficult time getting their stories published if they had described them as "memoirs" in their query letters? I have noticed that authors of nonfiction are expected to have a "platform" (to be a bit of a household word or to have a following) in a way that is not expected of fiction authors, and that memoirs are expected to be about someone that folks have already heard of, as opposed to being "Example A" of some phenomenon (being a coal miner, being an autistic person, being a gay person in the military, whatever).