Paul Whybrow
Full Member
Various Colonists have mentioned their use of the social media sites. There's so much conflicting advice about building a presence online, gathering followers as a way of ensuring a decent launch of a book through self-publishing. It's also reckoned that literary agents assess a potential client's viability through the number of followers they have, who might become readers should the book be traditionally published.
I've also read that agents don't place that much importance of a writer's social media presence, relying instead on the quality of the writing and whether a story is marketable. Obviously there have been well-known successes for debut authors, that were based on having millions of blog followers or YouTube subscribers - such as Zoella and her Girl Online.
I have LinkedIn, Pinterest, FaceBook personal and business profiles, a Wordpress blog and a Twitter account. I haven't done a huge amount of work with any of them. Twitter confuses me more than the rest, though I've seen many writers recommend it above the other social media sites. I've followed about 400 people, and 70 have followed me, and I get about twenty notifications of new followers a week.
Many of them are for paid-for services, such as book reviews or editing services - which I ignore. I did find a couple of useful snippets of information about literary agents' preferences via tweets, but nothing that wasn't already on MS Wishlist. It's easier for them to say what they're after at the moment in this way, rather than do so on their literary agency's website.
As I begin work on my second novel, I'm wondering how much time to devote to these different sites. They're so time-consuming, and it's tricky not to duplicate content - which is said to be a bad thing by marketing experts.
What do the Colonists think of the different social media sites? Have you had any great successes, or at least formed useful relationships? Do you think that any of them are overrated?
I've also read that agents don't place that much importance of a writer's social media presence, relying instead on the quality of the writing and whether a story is marketable. Obviously there have been well-known successes for debut authors, that were based on having millions of blog followers or YouTube subscribers - such as Zoella and her Girl Online.
I have LinkedIn, Pinterest, FaceBook personal and business profiles, a Wordpress blog and a Twitter account. I haven't done a huge amount of work with any of them. Twitter confuses me more than the rest, though I've seen many writers recommend it above the other social media sites. I've followed about 400 people, and 70 have followed me, and I get about twenty notifications of new followers a week.
Many of them are for paid-for services, such as book reviews or editing services - which I ignore. I did find a couple of useful snippets of information about literary agents' preferences via tweets, but nothing that wasn't already on MS Wishlist. It's easier for them to say what they're after at the moment in this way, rather than do so on their literary agency's website.
As I begin work on my second novel, I'm wondering how much time to devote to these different sites. They're so time-consuming, and it's tricky not to duplicate content - which is said to be a bad thing by marketing experts.
What do the Colonists think of the different social media sites? Have you had any great successes, or at least formed useful relationships? Do you think that any of them are overrated?