• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

Re Nick Cheetham's comments

Status
Not open for further replies.

E G Logan

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2018
Location
Liguria, Italy
LitBits
100
Italy
Nick Cheetham's replies on Pop–Up Submissions tonight on Women's Fiction (20 Feb) were interesting.

I knew that Literary Fiction was a judgment writers were wise to leave to others (agent, publisher...) but I never imagined that describing one's work as Women's Commercial Fiction could also be seen as getting a bit above oneself!

It's clear he's irritated by labels such as that; but for every agent or publisher who shares his view, I can show you several – double figures, no problem – who absolutely don't.
And what about Submissions websites such as Curtis Brown's, for example, or Query Manager in the US, which provide, and insist on completion of, an online drop-down menu choice of category with options such as Women's Commercial Fiction?
Also, I have NEVER read a 'How To Write a Submissions/Query Letter' article that did not specify a descriptor of that sort. Not one. And I've read a fair few now.

Perhaps Cheetham meant terms like Women's Fiction/Women's Commercial Fiction were too vague – but, with respect, HoZ's 'Summer Reading' isn't very precise.

Obviously this is only one more of the judgments around the Submissions process that are subjective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top