J
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.
This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.
Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…
We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.
You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box
True and I don't think any of us are saying that most heroes are perfect. I think we were--at least I was--talking about really screwed up heroes. Looking at Jason's examples, it's kind of like the difference in Pirates of the Caribbean between Will, who has some issues but amounts to a pretty put-together hero, and Jack, who has lots of issues.None of this surprises me. Comics always were about flawed heroes and villains. After all, nobody's perfect. Flawed characters have always been popular. Captain Ahab, Captain Nemo, Captain Kirk...they all have "issues". Any superhero would be super screwed up, otherwise what's the point of the story? Can you think of a storyline where the hero is perfect? How screwed up would someone have to be to be "Perfect"?
Love that quote. Tends to be a salient theme in a lot of my work.Any good man who fights evil is in danger of turning into that which he opposes.
Friedrich Nietzsche put it well:
"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you."
Yup yup yupLove that quote. Tends to be a salient theme in a lot of my work.
@Karen Gray, it should sound familiar to you...
I have a new frustrated hero to add to my list! Yas! Phil Coulson from Agents of SHIELD. I don't want to give away what happened in the winter finale (which ended for me ten minutes ago) in case someone hasn't seen it yet, but he definitely has some issues.
I have a new frustrated hero to add to my list! Yas! Phil Coulson from Agents of SHIELD. I don't want to give away what happened in the winter finale (which ended for me ten minutes ago) in case someone hasn't seen it yet, but he definitely has some issues.
Well — put, Nick. We've hit that dead horse with "there are no new stories" I don't know how many times, but superhero stories are one place where it really rings true — how many different ways can you portray "evil unstoppable force meets good immovable object?" Starring Awesome Man and Some Girl. Coming soon to Fox.Ah, superheroes. Batman driven by revenge, Spidey by guilt.
But consider Sherlock Holmes. A bit like Hercule Poirot, he doesn't seem to have any moral imperative, he is driven purely by the desire to prove how clever he is.
The odd thing about superhero stories is that they essentially re-tell the same story again and again. Hulk smash! Solving internal stories becomes a problem so long term love interests have to suffer the indignity of countless misunderstandings, kidnappings, breakups, loss of memories and even if they marry their true love they get killed off swiftly. Ongoing stories can't be resolved and the illusion of change is ultimately no change at all.
So all spidey stories retell Amazing Fantasy 15 and all Sherlock Holmes stories have an insoluble mystery that he solves. The stories become the crime or the villain. Doc Ock, Sandman, Green Goblin and Venom. Moriarty or a closed door mystery. Spidey persists and he overcomes, finds the monster's flaw (David hit's Goliath in the eye with his slingshot).
Venom is interesting because he is the dark version of spidey, literally. And as someone else said, the antagonist is the mirror image of the hero. The Monster is what you could become, if you are not careful. That's implicit in Batman, very grey indeed with Wolverine, Punisher, X-Force.
As a fan, I can't let this one go unchallenged!But consider Sherlock Holmes.... he is driven purely by the desire to prove how clever he is.
As a fan, I can't let this one go unchallenged!
Holmes doesn't care if people think him clever, stupid, arrogant, polite... anything. His motivation is the solving of the puzzle for the puzzle's sake. He can and does disregard human feelings altogether and works purely to exercise his mind and for love of his subject. The reader often thinks he is clever of course, but for Holmes every problem is an intellectual exercise, nothing more. Apart from Irene Adler, possibly.
Spot on Bernard
YOU sir have done great works...KG, I once wrote an antagonist with so much character depth, I guess, that I had a reader contact me to tell me how sad she was when I killed him off! He was a nasty toady, but there was a very human reason for his behavior. I just didn't feel the need to redeem him.