• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

News Oh Dear… This Doesn’t Look Good…

Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Yup. Honestly, there's something about her style that feels a bit bogus. It's "hand wavy", if you know what I mean...
 
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
So I haven’t read a single word written by Ms. Winn / Walker, but… here are some conjectures...

* I assume she’s got some real, natural writing talent. What a shame, then, that things have gone off the rails like this. As Matt says above, they really didn’t have to.

* Bev said, early on, that her spidey-sense started to tingle a lot while reading… it didn’t feel right, not sincere, genuine. Why didn’t anyone else (agent! editor!) pick this up, too?

* The disaster-scenario would be that Ms. Winn really can’t write very well/or at all, and this was a project largely engineered by the agent (or less likely, the editor). In this case, Winn could argue were there a court case that – Hey… it wasn’t me! You guys did all the “constructive editing”…. I simply took your advice! That would be nasty, because Winn may not have very deep pockets (now!) but the publisher does, and they might become a target for any US litigation. Hope this wasn’t the case.
 
I don't know how much impact this could have in the US. I think we're quite accepting of the fact that everything is made up, from the White House to Hollywood and back. Prime example, the movie Fargo, says "based on true events" at the start of the film and none of it is even kind of based on a true event (okay, a guy tried to hire a hit man to kill his wife, but he tried to hire an undercover cop so it didn't go far). I did love that the TV series of the same name carried on with that tag, and again; whole cloth
 
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Why didn’t anyone else (agent! editor!) pick this up, too?
I think someone may have done, had to have done, but day-to-day junior staff would keep quiet once the production process was rolling. It was at the acquisition point where the hard questions – does this really sound right? – should have been asked, by more senior people. Agent included. (Whose website raves about Winn. Even now, today.)

But commercial thinking obviously won out. And, authenticity and ethics aside, her book has sold well, so from that point of view alone, they were right.
 
LATEST – from today's The Bookseller

"Penguin Michael Joseph delays publication​

of Raynor Winn's next book"​

The Bookseller said: "Penguin Michael Joseph (PMJ) will delay the publication of The Salt Path author Raynor Winn’s next book, On Winter Hill, following an investigation in the Observer over the weekend that suggested her debut memoir was not entirely true.

"A statement from the publisher read: "Given recent events, in particular intrusive conjecture around Moth’s health condition which has caused considerable distress to Raynor Winn and her family, it is our priority to support the author at this time. With this in mind, Penguin Michael Joseph, together with the author, have made the decision to delay the publication of On Winter Hill from this October. We will announce a new publication date in due course." "
 
LATEST – from today's The Bookseller

"Penguin Michael Joseph delays publication​

of Raynor Winn's next book"​

The Bookseller said: "Penguin Michael Joseph (PMJ) will delay the publication of The Salt Path author Raynor Winn’s next book, On Winter Hill, following an investigation in the Observer over the weekend that suggested her debut memoir was not entirely true.

"A statement from the publisher read: "Given recent events, in particular intrusive conjecture around Moth’s health condition which has caused considerable distress to Raynor Winn and her family, it is our priority to support the author at this time. With this in mind, Penguin Michael Joseph, together with the author, have made the decision to delay the publication of On Winter Hill from this October. We will announce a new publication date in due course." "
I think in non-PR speak this is saying "There's a bit of a Raynor kerfuffle right now, but it should completely blow over if we back up a year."
 
I think in non-PR speak
Absolutely. So so cynical. But not a surprise. I hope that fence they are sitting on proves majorly uncomfortable over time.

So now we await a move from the agent – and the gushing literary agency.
(I'll bet they are on the phone right now to their solicitors. And if not, they would be well advised to do so.)
 
So now we await a move from the agent
Agents rarely carry the can for this sort of thing. Unless they actively participated in / knowingly connived with / the deception in question, they usually aren’t involved.
However…
I can’t imagine it will do their reputation with the publisher much good!
 
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Matt, when the book first came out, it was just another hiking/walking/travel work with a sad subtext. (not unusual for the genre) It didn't call for deep fact checking until it was way too late.

In my experience, publishers do little beyond confirming correct foreign word spellings and outright plagiarism. Houses like Hippocrene - famous for their multicultural titles - are relentless spelling checkers and asked nothing else.

"Name" journalists are held to a higher standard and also command bigger advances.
 
Matt, when the book first came out, it was just another hiking/walking/travel work with a sad subtext. (not unusual for the genre) It didn't call for deep fact checking until it was way too late.

In my experience, publishers do little beyond confirming correct foreign word spellings and outright plagiarism. Houses like Hippocrene - famous for their multicultural titles - are relentless spelling checkers and asked nothing else.

"Name" journalists are held to a higher standard and also command bigger advances.
This is fair, as my friends and the people Claudia has worked on are all working with mid-6 figure advances, and major publishing houses.
 
And the saga rumbles on with more :astonished-face::skull-and-crossbones: coming to the surface:
MSN
Yeah, the Mail also did further much-racking and name-calling the other day, too. At this point, I don’t know that it’s going to sway her readers, tho…? She may get the sympathy vote, find she’s pretty much unpublishable by trad pubs, and go on to sell gazillions self-pub! :) p.
 
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.

Further Articles from the Author Platform

Latest Articles By Litopians

  • The Pink Coupe at the Catch-All Station
    About a quarter of a century ago, I developed the habit of working in German car factories. The exce ...
  • Young People Today…
    I went to college to do an Art Foundation course. Yay, good for me. But I was 48. And almost everyon ...
  • The Welsh One
    . We gazed from Cardiff’s seafront as the diamond radiance of a million stars glittered in summer ...
  • WE ALL MAKE MISTAKES
    I know there is an increasing upward trend in sales with audiobooks lately; people listening to a bo ...
  • What We Feed Strangers
    My first job on this side of the world saw me driving my boss’s wife’s little red roadster down ...
  • The Road Does Go Ever On
    So, midway through a recent walk through the forest, my phone notified me that I had done it, I had ...
  • Another Night in A&E (Part 2)
    My husband has not had a full-blown stroke.  He has more than likely had a TIA.  He is feeling bet ...
What Goes Around
Comes Around!
Back
Top