For the first time in my life I'm actually PLANNING my novel. I'm not a natural planner. I'm a seeing-what-happens writer who enjoys evolving the characters as she goes. Hence making a road map in advance is going to be a tad different.
Needless to say, I'm already finding myself with decisions I've never had to make before. My main character is going to be a charming misguided baddie on a downward spiral. In a sense, his 'character arch' (not sure if that's the right word) will have to be completed at the start of the novel, so that he can 'fall to pieces' and unravel during the story to make his his actions work throughout.
The problem is this: I've noticed this is a hec of a lot of character development at the beginning, tons of 'info' which I feel has to go in there. I then have to throw a lot of cr*p at him straight away to get him onto the path to hell. Now, how much of 'him' do I concentrate on. I have to cover his difficult past, his present situation, his weaknesses, addictions, flaws and fears etc, of course. There is a reason he is a bit of a nutty creature. But can I realistically use all his totality at the beginning without making the novel too full and confusing from the off? Should I stick to one one side of him, and then build him slowly, bit by bit before I make him go down hill? Or is this simply a case of doing what Agent Pete always says: More meaning from less words. Can a main character be too complex at the start? Would he turn into an over-worked caricature who annoys the readers?
Too many questions for a Friday. Or maybe it's a no brainer, and I'm just concerned with nonsense I should actually know by now. Any thoughts, anyone?
Needless to say, I'm already finding myself with decisions I've never had to make before. My main character is going to be a charming misguided baddie on a downward spiral. In a sense, his 'character arch' (not sure if that's the right word) will have to be completed at the start of the novel, so that he can 'fall to pieces' and unravel during the story to make his his actions work throughout.
The problem is this: I've noticed this is a hec of a lot of character development at the beginning, tons of 'info' which I feel has to go in there. I then have to throw a lot of cr*p at him straight away to get him onto the path to hell. Now, how much of 'him' do I concentrate on. I have to cover his difficult past, his present situation, his weaknesses, addictions, flaws and fears etc, of course. There is a reason he is a bit of a nutty creature. But can I realistically use all his totality at the beginning without making the novel too full and confusing from the off? Should I stick to one one side of him, and then build him slowly, bit by bit before I make him go down hill? Or is this simply a case of doing what Agent Pete always says: More meaning from less words. Can a main character be too complex at the start? Would he turn into an over-worked caricature who annoys the readers?
Too many questions for a Friday. Or maybe it's a no brainer, and I'm just concerned with nonsense I should actually know by now. Any thoughts, anyone?