E G Logan
Full Member
The Guardian today carries an article which examines the world of celebrity ghostwriting. That is to say, ghosting the writing of 'celebrities'. Generally memoirs, of one sort or other.
So far, so not new. But this article goes further, researching what the author suggests is an increasing trend: ghostwritten celebrity fiction. (See link below.)
I accept that for the 'ghost' such exercises are just business as usual, and very little different – possibly with a slightly freer hand – from 'auto'biographies and memoirs. But for me, the idea of fiction being published under the name of a celebrity without the "time, skill or patience to write it" is at best problematical, at worst 'OMG, pass the sick bucket!'
What does everyone else think?
So far, so not new. But this article goes further, researching what the author suggests is an increasing trend: ghostwritten celebrity fiction. (See link below.)
I accept that for the 'ghost' such exercises are just business as usual, and very little different – possibly with a slightly freer hand – from 'auto'biographies and memoirs. But for me, the idea of fiction being published under the name of a celebrity without the "time, skill or patience to write it" is at best problematical, at worst 'OMG, pass the sick bucket!'
What does everyone else think?
‘Does it really matter who wrote it?’: the rise of ghostwritten celebrity fiction
Readers might expect celebrities to hire professionals to help them with their memoirs. But when it comes to fiction, things get more complicated …
www.theguardian.com