E G Logan
Full Member
I need to have a pathologist (US medical examiner):
A. have difficulty establishing the very recent time of death (for good but lengthy reasons); and
B. set a band for the best estimate of one and a half to two hours, so as to include more than one suspect. I'd like to suggest that's unusual.
Are these two things mutually exclusive? Like, "that's not an unusual band at all. It's pretty average."
Is it actually possible to narrow it this far, given the death is recent?
Can it ever be estimated more closely than that?
Apologies for my huge ignorance here. And thanks for any help. This is fiction but I'd like to get this right – or rather, not wrong.
A. have difficulty establishing the very recent time of death (for good but lengthy reasons); and
B. set a band for the best estimate of one and a half to two hours, so as to include more than one suspect. I'd like to suggest that's unusual.
Are these two things mutually exclusive? Like, "that's not an unusual band at all. It's pretty average."
Is it actually possible to narrow it this far, given the death is recent?
Can it ever be estimated more closely than that?
Apologies for my huge ignorance here. And thanks for any help. This is fiction but I'd like to get this right – or rather, not wrong.