• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

Blog Post: Pride Weekend, Part 2.

Latest Articles from Litopia’s Collective Blog

From Our Blog

Full Member
Blogger
Joined
Feb 3, 2024
LitBits
0
New blog post by Jason L. – discussions in this thread, please
---

I’ve never liked my voice.

I’m not alone. People, in general, hate their voices. We are simply not biologically intended to hear our voices the way that other people do. I hear it and I think, “Who’s that guy?”

No, actually, I don’t. I don’t do that. I hear it and I think, “Who’s that fag?”

I said what I said.

And then, a month ago, I lost mine.

Not in the way you’d think. I didn’t start whispering. It wasn’t laryngitis. Over the course of one desperate illness, my speaking voice dropped by an octave and several decibels. Initially, I was amused by the outcome. Unable to speak the way I had, everything became reduced to a deep, husky purr. Oh, well, I thought. A few days and it’ll be gone.

Four weeks later, it’s still here, and my voice is that of a stranger’s.

That’s the thing about our voices. It’s why we wince when we read our earliest fiction when our naked ambitions and desires are most on display. It paints a picture of who we are. We make assumptions of others based on the speech patterns we hear. Their class, approximate age, education level, the region they grew up in, and gender are all immediately available. Scratch the surface and there are even more subtle differences: the ghost of forgotten dialects and extinct languages preserved when Cornish and Irish speakers made the last conversion to English generations ago, the subtle hesitation when Japanese speakers commit to saying words like “rally”, the awkward syntax that both makes sense and sounds somehow off when Slavic-language speakers try to navigate a language frustratingly devoid of declensions. Or something that I was raised to understand that was the most shameful thing of all: my sexual orientation.

In the past, I have learned to accept, if not cherish my voice. I have formed a hard, defiant shell about it. I have rechristened myself: I am not gay, I am homosexually gifted. I have learned to make it a joke. I have learned to hide my rage at being dismissed, mocked, and intimidated. But now, my voice has become discordant. The louder I get the more the cracks appear.

There is a context to my rage. During the 1980s, when the rest of the Western world was building on the excesses of the 1970s, Americans enthusiastically rejected that. “Women’s lib” became a joke, feminists were rechristened feminazis, and gay people, who were making so many strides toward public acceptance during the Carter administration, found their ranks decimated during the AIDS epidemic. In 1985, Houston mayoral candidate Louie Welch said that the solution to the problem was to shoot all the queers. Over a hundred thousand American citizens died due to governmental indifference during the AIDS epidemic. And throughout the South, already poor and militantly xenophobic—mostly against Yankees—the conservative backlash that I lived through was particularly vile.

When I was a sophomore in high school, I took one day out and tallied up all of the times someone called me queer, faggot, or any anti-gay slur. There was never any context: I would be at my locker, changing classes, asking about a teacher about a homework assignment and boom. There we go. Thank you, Mr. Hunsucker, for shrugging his shoulder and saying, “Well, what do you expect?” when I stared at him in silent betrayal. That day, I tallied up the number of slurs, multiplied it by the number of days in the school year (180) and the remainder of the time until graduation. And when it reached over 10,000, I went home and took the remainder of my mother’s Xanax prescription.

Don’t do that, people. Apparently the amount of Xanax a teenaged body can metabolize is pretty high. If you’re going to off yourself, you’ve got to commit to taking a lot more than I did, or else you’ll wake up with your mother beating the hell out of you for eating her prescription and telling the neighbors you’re a druggy.

And my voice became, in my mind, the big thing that labelled me, that transformed me from the guy I wanted to be—creative, cool, funny—and labelled me, publicly, with a word and an identity I resisted because of that sense of shame. In my mind, I railed at people who made that decision for me, who “outed” me on a perpetual basis, as if I had a beacon over my head. But as I settled into that identity, learned to enjoy it, I stopped hating my voice nearly as much.

And then it came to bite me. In strange ways. The day I discovered my ex’s parents called me “that fag” when they had only spoken to me on the phone. It was 2004. The day my dean pulled me into her office and told me that I needed to learn how to “comport myself” when it came to my “lifestyle choices.” She used air quotes. And I was so indoctrinated in my own sense of shame that I apologized and confessed how unprofessional it was that I had alluded to my male partner. It was 2014.

That sense of inferiority has pervaded me my whole life. It is, I think, why so many gay people seriously consider the military. It’s not because of the perks of a nice body or the uniform. It’s not even the company of other men—most of them will be aggressively straight and kind of obnoxious about it anyway. It’s about the implicit promise that once you get out of the military, you’ll be equipped to handle yourself in a world that’s inclined to ignore you, belittle you, and intimidate you. It’s the idea that you can become your own hero, stare down people who could have bullied you and refused to budge an inch. It’s the idea that you will never again feel compelled to apologize for acknowledging that Title IX training also includes you. It’s the idea that you have a place at the table.

And that table is shrinking as anti-gay voices have gained prominence. Even the dialogue about them is somehow polite and restrained, as if their opinions are more reasonable. We even cloak bigotry in the language of phobia, as if we are suggesting that, poor dears, they’re terrified of a group of people. But the truth is that they’re not. We don’t use the term negrophobic or gynophobic. And yet, it’s only natural that we get all indulgent about their bias—so natural and ingrained that even LGBT people themselves unthinkingly say homophobic rather than anti-gay. Words have meaning to both the speaker and the listener. And by accepting that appellation for our enemies, LGBT people are also accepting that they have an implicit right to their bigotry.

They don’t.

And so, perhaps my voice has not gone after all. Perhaps this is the way that I can still speak up. And one day, whether I recover my original voice or not, perhaps I can hear my voice and say, “Who’s that dude?” And leave it at that.
---

By @Jason L.
Get the discussion going – post your thoughts & comments in the thread below…
 
We even cloak bigotry in the language of phobia, as if we are suggesting that, poor dears, they’re terrified of a group of people. But the truth is that they’re not. We don’t use the term negrophobic or gynophobic. And yet, it’s only natural that we get all indulgent about their bias—so natural and ingrained that even LGBT people themselves unthinkingly say homophobic rather than anti-gay. Words have meaning to both the speaker and the listener. And by accepting that appellation for our enemies, LGBT people are also accepting that they have an implicit right to their bigotry.
Spot-on @Jason L.
I'm going to use the term anti-gay from now on. It's not a phobia, it's ignorance at best and hatred at worst.
 
We even cloak bigotry in the language of phobia, as if we are suggesting that, poor dears, they’re terrified of a group of people. But the truth is that they’re not. We don’t use the term negrophobic or gynophobic. And yet, it’s only natural that we get all indulgent about their bias—so natural and ingrained that even LGBT people themselves unthinkingly say homophobic rather than anti-gay. Words have meaning to both the speaker and the listener. And by accepting that appellation for our enemies, LGBT people are also accepting that they have an implicit right to their bigotry.
This has always driven me up the wall, too. It’s the looseness of language and all that that implies. Homophobia, arachnophobia… no real difference, right? And yes, it does indeed normalize hatred.
 
Well said, whatever your timbre, Jason. And an excellent point about the word 'homophobia'. I, too, shall correct others who use it.

As a teenager, I always thought it was weird wordage as, in my mind, it meant being scared of humans. At root, i think lots of anti-gay people are scared of the Other and also tend to harbour a ton of other prejudices too. The UK seems to be improving on this score, albeit slowly, but that's from the perspective of a straight, white woman so anyone who knows better, correct me if I'm wrong.
 
The UK seems to be improving on this score, albeit slowly
I admire your optimism.

Maybe it's just me, but it feels like things are worse since the Brexit vote; it's as if people feel they have a right to express their prejudices freely and without apology.

It seemed easier in the 90s somehow. Or maybe I still had some youthful optimism back then.
 
I admire your optimism.

Maybe it's just me, but it feels like things are worse since the Brexit vote; it's as if people feel they have a right to express their prejudices freely and without apology.

It seemed easier in the 90s somehow. Or maybe I still had some youthful optimism back then.
General political landscape is definitely far worse. Frighteningly so.
 
Maybe it's just me, but it feels like things are worse since the Brexit vote; it's as if people feel they have a right to express their prejudices freely and without apology.
General political landscape is definitely far worse. Frighteningly so.
My own take on this is that matters are clarifying. The extremes are far more apparent than they used to be. Agendas are less hidden. It’s easier to tell who really thinks what. The wolves’ sheepskin is becoming threadbare :)

And that’s no bad thing, imho.
 
My own take on this is that matters are clarifying. The extremes are far more apparent than they used to be. Agendas are less hidden. It’s easier to tell who really thinks what. The wolves’ sheepskin is becoming threadbare :)

And that’s no bad thing, imho.
That's a good way of looking at it. Know your enemies and all that.
 
There is a generational change afoot, too, which I think will be the most seismic cultural transformation we’ve seen since the 1960s.

A wholesale rejection of “older” values seems to be happening or, more accurately, the values of those who have brought us to this unhappy state; socially, culturally, economically, politically, environmentally.

Toss into this conflagration the likelihood of a ground war in Europe within the next five years, the eviscerating impact of AI on society and employment (discussed here) and… we’re in for interesting times :)
 
@Jason L., great article. I was pained to hear of your teenage trauma. I'm glad you were tougher than the Xanax.

We even cloak bigotry in the language of phobia, as if we are suggesting that, poor dears, they’re terrified of a group of people. But the truth is that they’re not.
I agree that the phobia suffix is inappropriate and that anti-gay is a better term. I do think, though, that bigotry is often born of fear. But fear of what, exactly? There was an article in The New Republic back in 2016 entitled "The Anti-Slavery Roots of Today’s “-Phobia” Obsession". It's a thought-provoking read that critically deconstructs the word phobia when used to indicate bigotry, with parallels to your comments above. There was one part in particular – regarding racism in 19th-century America – that jumped out at me (paragraph 10):

If Southern slaveholding had anything to do with fear, it wasn’t so much a fear of people of color as it was a fear that white supremacy might be exposed, challenged, and demolished. Thus motivated, a writer for Charles Swift’s Yarmouth Register in 1862 proposed a new name for the disease. Discontented with Negrophobia’s connotations, the author explains: “After some thought, I have concluded that their disease must be Negro-equality-phobia.”​

That's it, isn't it? The fear that so often underpins bigotry is nothing more than fear of upsetting a status quo. And the only way to truly change an entrenched view is to educate, both intellectually and emotionally. And to do that one needs a voice, like yours, Jason. "Who's that dude?" He's a guy I want to listen to.
 
It seemed easier in the 90s somehow. Or maybe I still had some youthful optimism back then.
It was easier! I think we all had the youthful optimism of a society freshly released from the Cold War – anything is possible, the end of history!

Hmm, didn't quite work out like that that though, did it? Democracy vs communism turned into democracy vs authoritarianism. Arguably the same thing but generalized. And so many people have been failed by the promises the democracies made, which has opened the door to extreme forms of populism. As Pete said above:
we’re in for interesting times :)

It's easy to be gloomy. There is much to be gloomy about. But I have young kids, so I dig deep to find my optimism – real, actionable optimism – if only for them.
 
Back
Top