• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

Mental Conflict.

Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Status
Not open for further replies.

AusGood9

Basic
Joined
Feb 10, 2018
Location
Burnley, England.
LitBits
0
Is it me, or do other writers feel the same? When I'm writing my mind has a purpose and an end game. I add and take away subplots as well as characters and enjoy play god with my characters. When the book is finished and I've completed the 4th/5th final edit, I search once again for an agent who may take me on. That's when all the self-doubts hit me and I get swamped with failure. "Is this right?" "Is that right?" "Perhaps I should change this?"
I just wonder if I'm my own worst enemy, or do other writers have the same feelings?
 
Actually, I have no end game when I start a story, it usually starts with the thread of an idea. It's only when it get going and get the character talking that I start to feel my way into a conflict.... but the personal aspect of trying to change things/self doubt etc is something we all go through. What I have stopped worrying about is whether anyone will like what I've written. If they don't like it, that's their hard luck! I learned a long time ago not to write for the market, but write what I like, then keep making it tighter and better. Only 4-5 edits? Usually about 20 before I'm happy with myself even if no one shares my self-satisfaction - but one day... This from someone who wrote genre for 10 years and got fed up with being dictated to.
 
Yeah I get both of your points AusGood and Chris. For me it’s a delicate balance: I don’t like writing for approval, but I do like to write in such a way that my message can reach many people. These two things are similar yet they are different. Getting approval certainly opens doors, but it’s more of a part of the process than a goal by itself. The main goal is reaching people with a message, and reflecting on the way I communicate is a part of that. It’s getting approval for the right reasons, without emotionally attaching to it so much, in this sense getting approval is having a successful communication.

I do think it’s good to reflect on what we write, not to put everything under a microscope, but to look at an overall project. Is the message coming across? For example, with the first book I wrote, Verbal Dancing, I can see now that the structure of it works really well, but I could work on my style of writing to give people more real life examples that they could relate to, more motivation to turn the page.
 
Self-doubt goes with the territory. I try not to get too emotionally involved in any one piece of writing, because invariably someone is going to hate it, no matter how good it is. And, truth is, no matter how good it is, it can be improved. My job as the writer is to decide when it's good enough for me. When I am done tinkering with a piece, I'm done. Some pieces are never going to be what others want them to be. Some are never going to be what I want them to be. So when I stop learning new things from feedback, I move on to a new piece of writing, which will hopefully start at a better level than the previous one.
 
Self-doubt goes with the territory. I try not to get too emotionally involved in any one piece of writing, because invariably someone is going to hate it, no matter how good it is. And, truth is, no matter how good it is, it can be improved. My job as the writer is to decide when it's good enough for me. When I am done tinkering with a piece, I'm done. Some pieces are never going to be what others want them to be. Some are never going to be what I want them to be. So when I stop learning new things from feedback, I move on to a new piece of writing, which will hopefully start at a better level than the previous one.


That’s a good point Robinne! There is a time to say ‘I’m done’. For my first book it took four years, of putting it aside and picking it up again many times. But then I came to a point where I was definitely done.
 
Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Further Articles from the Author Platform

Latest Articles By Litopians

  • The Shadow Durian
    As a lifelong foreigner, I’ve learnt that being open to new things smooths the path considerably. ...
  • Goodbye Eeyore, Hello Tigger
    Granny was churchy. She grew up in an era that saw living by the Bible as an important British chara ...
  • 21st Century Song of Summer
         It’s sobering to think that while summer is celebrated in some parts of the world with mus ...
  • Falcon Theory
    “So,” said Goethe to his friend Johann Peter Eckermann, “let us call it a Novelle, for what i ...
  • The Joy of Lit Mags
    While my first novel is tentatively making its way towards agents who already have too much to read, ...
  • Advertising and Social Media
    There has been much discussion in writing circles about how much a writer has to self-promote these ...
  • Future Abstract: Fights at Night
    SATIRE ALERT: The following abstract is entirely fictional and does not represent actual events or s ...
Back
Top