• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

Head-Hopping

Status
Not open for further replies.

Paul Whybrow

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Location
Cornwall, UK
LitBits
0
We've been talking about point of view (POV) on the Colony, and there's one aspect of it that's easy to make mistakes about—head-hopping.

Briefly, this means abruptly switching the POV within a scene or chapter, which is likely to confuse the reader, as they're unsure of who is saying or thinking something.

If you're going to write from another character's viewpoint, it's best to do so by indicating the transition in the narrative, or by using a clearly marked chapter break or scene break.

I'm currently writing my fifth Cornish Detective novel, and have reverted to multiple POV, which I last used in the second novel; the other three stories were told from the third person close viewpoint, (which is also known as third person limited), where the story is told through the eyes of my protagonist detective. I find it easier to write multiple POV, and it feels livelier to read, though it's vital to delineate who's talking. Third person close is great for revealing the thinking of my hero, but it also involves loads of telling rather than showing, where the supporting players report back to their boss with "He said", then "She said." Writing gurus reckon this to be a bad thing, but it's surprisingly common in best-selling titles.

I've been devoting a chapter to each of the main players, or alternating viewpoints by the use of section breaks. While editing, I noticed that I'd head hopped from the forensic pathologist to my protagonist detective, at the end of a chapter in which they'd met for their monthly restaurant meal, all told from her POV. Instead of her observing him walk away, getting smaller in the rear-view mirror, he stood watching his friend drive off in her car...d'oh! :rolleyes:

I know why I did so, as most of the previous nine chapters closed with the detective's thoughts on how the investigation was proceeding; I was writing robotically.

Have any of you committed this cardinal error?

It's particularly easy to do when writing conversation involving several characters.

point-of-view.jpg
 
Have any of you committed this cardinal error?

Yes, a few times. But I've usually spotted it fairly quickly.

If I write a multi-POV book I tend to change at chapter breaks so that the whole of a chapter is all from one character's POV. Sometimes I have changed with just a double line break between sections, but I have made it obvious to the reader that this has happened. I don't change POV between paragraphs or even (as I have despairingly read others do) changed "head" within the same paragraph. I find that is just too distracting to read sometimes.

However, when I was transferring one chapter of a multi-POV book to electronic form (I tend to write first drafts on paper:eek:) I found that I had somehow changed POV half way through the chapter, consequently I ended up rewriting a fair portion of the chapter to set it right.

Generally I'm fairly fastidious about staying in a POV for at least the whole scene. When writing multi-POV before I write a scene I think about who's POV to use for it to get best impact. Sometimes I even try writing the same scene several times from different POVs to see which works best.

But each to his own I guess.
 
Last edited:
I tried using multiple POV in a short novella, and thought I was really creating something viable. When I read it back it sounded like a single person suffering from multiple personality disorder, which required a lot of editing to make sense. It can really work when done well, but I agree, distinct separation is the key.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top