• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

Are adjectival commas on the way out?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brian Clegg

Basic
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Location
Swindon, UK
LitBits
0
I've no idea if 'adjectival commas' is the correct grammatical term, but I was pondering the other day the way that these commas seem to be dying out. (I suspect it's a good thing.)

What I mean is the ones that separate adjectives when you apply more than one to the same noun. The example that springs to mind immediately is Kipling's "grey-green, greasy Limpopo river" or I could go a little more mad myself and have an encounter with a "short, fat, balding, highly unpleasant accountant." (I don't know why it's an accountant, and I apologise if you are an accountant, its just the first word that came to mind.) Or even just a "big, bad wolf."

Admittedly multiple adjectives can be overused, but I'm finding when I do occasionally use them I am less likely to put the commas in than I used to. And no one seems to mind, so my suspicion is that they are on their way out in the evolution of English. Would you agree?
 
My editor has been taking them out lately, and I keep putting them back in. LOL!! Old habits are hard to break. ;)

That's odd--when I took a course in copy editing in order to certify as an editor (six years ago), I was taught to use these commas. Is this a wholesale change, or is it house style for your publisher?

By the way, at first I thought, "Who is Carol Rose and why have I not seen her post before?" :)
 
That's odd--when I took a course in copy editing in order to certify as an editor (six years ago), I was taught to use these commas. Is this a wholesale change, or is it house style for your publisher?

By the way, at first I thought, "Who is Carol Rose and why have I not seen her post before?" :)

I believe it's house style. :)
 
I think commas of all sorts have their place. If we remove commas then we'll have sentences and books filled with 'and's or 'or's. I personally feel that would make reading much harder. It's fair enough to say these punctuation marks are out of style, or no-one uses them much anymore, but what would we replace them with?
 
I think commas of all sorts have their place. If we remove commas then we'll have sentences and books filled with 'and's or 'or's. I personally feel that would make reading much harder. It's fair enough to say these punctuation marks are out of style, or no-one uses them much anymore, but what would we replace them with?

I'm not suggesting commas in general are going. Just that it now seems just as acceptable to write 'Say hello to the big bad wolf,' as 'Say hello to the big, bad wolf,' - and indeed as Carol Rose mentions, my editors quite often take such commas out these days.
 
I am a habitual user of excessive adjectives, and tend to play with using commas and omitting them, to control the flow the sentence. Like... I don't know...
"It was a somber morning, expectant, chill and gloomy as they saddled for the final portion of the..."
Is it excessive if it works?
 
I think commas of all sorts have their place. If we remove commas then we'll have sentences and books filled with 'and's or 'or's. I personally feel that would make reading much harder. It's fair enough to say these punctuation marks are out of style, or no-one uses them much anymore, but what would we replace them with?
Or you'd have choppy prose without compound sentences at all.
 
I read a hilarious piece once (maybe in the Onion? I can't remember now) about how all the commas were shifting to become apostrophes (or should I say apostrophe's). Now, THERE'S something that irritates me! Don't even get me going on gratuitous apostrophes!

Oh man! I see extra apostrophes all over the place now. I'm going to be so sad if that becomes a "thing".
 
I am a habitual user of excessive adjectives, and tend to play with using commas and omitting them, to control the flow the sentence. Like... I don't know...
"It was a somber morning, expectant, chill and gloomy as they saddled for the final portion of the..."
I think Jason has it -- you use them as a tool to control how the sentence is read, to create the effect you want. It will be very sad if that part of the writer's toolkit is removed to satisfy 'house style'.
 
I read a hilarious piece once (maybe in the Onion? I can't remember now) about how all the commas were shifting to become apostrophes (or should I say apostrophe's). Now, THERE'S something that irritates me! Don't even get me going on gratuitous apostrophes!
*head/desk* My number one pet peeve!!! Makes me CRAZY!!!!! It's even worse when I see other authors do it!!!! Or when they use the wrong words: who's when they should have used whose, etc. AAARRRGGHHHH!! My eyes!!!!!!
 
As for taking out commas between adjectives per house style, to be fair, I really don't think taking out the commas in "long, black, silk scarf" is going to affect the flow of the story. Those are the kinds of changes I see in my manuscripts of late. The phrase becomes "long black silk scarf." Not really a difference there in the way you read it.
 
To me, there is a difference. The commas slow down the read and put additional emphasis on each adjective. It gives a distinctly different feel. But maybe that's just me.
 
To me, there is a difference. The commas slow down the read and put additional emphasis on each adjective. It gives a distinctly different feel. But maybe that's just me.
I agree with @Marc Joan
I use a lot of commas to indicate pauses in the narrative as I would speak it. Maybe not all need to be there, but sometimes I feel that the extra comma changes the tone of the sentence structure.
 
I agree with @Marc Joan
I use a lot of commas to indicate pauses in the narrative as I would speak it. Maybe not all need to be there, but sometimes I feel that the extra comma changes the tone of the sentence structure.
We've butted heads on this one before, Karen. You will find that using commas, to insert a pause imitating speech often leaves no independent clause (see what I did there). But I was literally once employed as a grammar Nazi. I'm not sure where this one falls on the continuum of "correct/incorrect" and "personal preference," however.
 
We've butted heads on this one before, Karen. You will find that using commas, to insert a pause imitating speech often leaves no independent clause (see what I did there). But I was literally once employed as a grammar Nazi. I'm not sure where this one falls on the continuum of "correct/incorrect" and "personal preference," however.
Oh I know. Tis a habit.

Now it's uncertain dashes :p haha I blame your influence!
 
I've no idea if 'adjectival commas' is the correct grammatical term, but I was pondering the other day the way that these commas seem to be dying out. (I suspect it's a good thing.)

What I mean is the ones that separate adjectives when you apply more than one to the same noun. The example that springs to mind immediately is Kipling's "grey-green, greasy Limpopo river" or I could go a little more mad myself and have an encounter with a "short, fat, balding, highly unpleasant accountant." (I don't know why it's an accountant, and I apologise if you are an accountant, its just the first word that came to mind.) Or even just a "big, bad wolf."

Admittedly multiple adjectives can be overused, but I'm finding when I do occasionally use them I am less likely to put the commas in than I used to. And no one seems to mind, so my suspicion is that they are on their way out in the evolution of English. Would you agree?

LOL I think it's considered poor writing to use a lot of adjectives. Although, the ones you chose as examples are obvious exceptions to the 'rule'.

I'm not a grammar nazi because I don't know enough about grammar. I didn't even know I was a fan of the oxford comma until I looked up oxford comma. Also, I never know what to capitalize. I mean, should I backspace and capitalize Oxford? I think that would be correct but .... I don't see what harm it does to leave it with a lower case o.

But .... back to adjectival commas ... I think they deserve commas. Definitely.
 
“Thurber was asked by a correspondent: "Why did you have a comma in the sentence, 'After dinner, the men went into the living-room'?" And his answer was probably one of the loveliest things ever said about punctuation. "This particular comma," Thurber explained, "was Ross's way of giving the men time to push back their chairs and stand up.”
Lynne Truss, Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation
 
“Thurber was asked by a correspondent: "Why did you have a comma in the sentence, 'After dinner, the men went into the living-room'?" And his answer was probably one of the loveliest things ever said about punctuation. "This particular comma," Thurber explained, "was Ross's way of giving the men time to push back their chairs and stand up.”
Lynne Truss, Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation
It's true. That's what I saw in the comma, before I even read through to the end. All muttonchops and smoothing their frock coats. Warm cherry-wood paneling, gilded picture frames, fine crystal... in a comma. I love writing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top