• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

Penguin Schuster merger

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I agree.

Stephen King's argument seemed apposite: if the companies that made up the merged entity continued to bid against one another (as we were told they would), that would be like a husband and wife competing to buy the same house.

And what struck me – underlined by a lawyer involved – was that even if those companies did that, because the current management instructed them to, there was no firm commitment to continue doing so further into the future. If, for example, management or trading circumstances changed markedly.
 
I can't help wondering if the US DoJ chose its target: the danger of a possible reduced market and advances specifically for blockbuster type books – as opposed to for the book publishing industry in its entirety – was a case of 'pick your battles'...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top