To me, I’m afraid it looks like they suckers."
Well they suck if they are not taking a stand for bankrupting AI.
"Also backing Anthropic's appeal, advocates representing authors, libraries, and digital rights groups" These organisations are pro...
More here:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/08/ai-industry-horrified-to-face-largest-copyright-class-action-ever-certified/
I'm not optimistic, given the state of endemic, naked corruption that’s been normalised now in Trump’s America...
Newborn Litopian here, freshly traumatised by a wishlist that I wouldn't wish on my best enemy, courtesy of @AgentPete
Looking forward to burning off people's eyebrows in The Lab and having mine burned off in return.
My goal is to find an...
Exactly.
There's a proposal to charge about a cent per email sent (by everyone) on the basis that this would make scam emails uneconomic.
Similarly, if ChatGPT et al were to charge realistic amounts for their services, this might deter scammers...
OK, so that’s the eventual pitch, thanks James, I was wondering how they monetised it.
This whole email has got ChatGPT written all over it. I bet they’re using the API to customize each individual scammy email.
It’s been big business for a decade or more, part of the “manosphere”. Courses cost megabucks. So wrong on every level.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.